Suppr超能文献

形状轨迹测试在区分轻度认知障碍老年人方面具有敏感性:一项无文化差异的五分钟测试。

The Shape Trail Test Is Sensitive in Differentiating Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Culture-neutral Five-minute Test.

作者信息

Ding Z, Chan A S

机构信息

Agnes S. Chan, Room 355, Sino Building, Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China, Email:

出版信息

J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(4):1166-1176. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.80.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Shape Trail Test (STT) was developed based upon the Trail Making Test, as a culture-neutral test for measuring processing speed and mental flexibility. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and validity of this five-minute test for differentiating individuals with normal cognition (NC), subjective memory impairment (SMI), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

METHOD

The study included 210 participants aged 50-80 years, with 70 participants in each group matched for age, education, and gender.

RESULTS

No significant difference in STT measures was found between the NC and SMI groups. In contrast, both the NC and SMI groups exhibited significantly better performance (shorter completion time in STT-A and STT-B and fewer STT-B errors) than the MCI group. No significant group differences were found in STT-A errors. Stepwise regression analysis identified three significant predictors for classifying the MCI group from the NC and/or SMI groups, including the STT-B completion time, the STT-A errors, and the interaction between STT-B completion time and STT-B errors. The composite score of these three predictors demonstrated good discriminatory power for classifying the MCI group from the other groups, with area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.76 - 0.79 (p < 0.001), sensitivities of 78.6% - 80%, and specificities of 60% - 61.4%. However, none of the STT measures or their interactions were significant predictors for differentiating the SMI group from the NC group. Besides, the STT measures were significantly correlated with age, education, and executive function measures.

DISCUSSION

The STT could be a culture- and language-free, reliable test for assessing executive function and a sensitive test for predicting MCI.

摘要

引言

形状连线测试(STT)是在连线测试的基础上开发的,是一种用于测量加工速度和心理灵活性的文化中性测试。本研究旨在评估这项五分钟测试在区分正常认知(NC)个体、主观记忆障碍(SMI)个体和轻度认知障碍(MCI)个体方面的准确性和有效性。

方法

该研究纳入了210名年龄在50 - 80岁之间的参与者,每组70名,在年龄、教育程度和性别方面进行了匹配。

结果

NC组和SMI组在STT测量方面没有显著差异。相比之下,NC组和SMI组的表现均显著优于MCI组(STT - A和STT - B的完成时间更短,STT - B的错误更少)。在STT - A错误方面未发现显著的组间差异。逐步回归分析确定了三个显著的预测因子,用于将MCI组与NC组和/或SMI组区分开来,包括STT - B的完成时间、STT - A的错误以及STT - B完成时间与STT - B错误之间的相互作用。这三个预测因子的综合得分在将MCI组与其他组区分开来方面具有良好的辨别力,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.76 - 0.79(p < 0.001),敏感性为78.6% - 80%,特异性为60% - 61.4%。然而,没有一项STT测量指标或它们的相互作用是区分SMI组和NC组的显著预测因子。此外,STT测量指标与年龄、教育程度和执行功能测量指标显著相关。

讨论

STT可能是一种无文化和语言限制、可靠的执行功能评估测试,也是预测MCI的敏感测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d7/12275825/ff1a7750d973/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验