• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[切口疝的危险因素与预防——循证依据是什么?]

[Risk factors and prevention of incisional hernia--what is evidence-based?].

作者信息

Jargon D, Friebe V, Hopt U T, Obermaier R

机构信息

Abteilung für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg.

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Sep;133(5):453-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1076961. Epub 2008 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1076961
PMID:18924043
Abstract

Incisional hernia is a late complication of laparotomy for which an evidence-based prohylactic approach is still lacking. Postoperatively, incisional hernias occur because of multiple factors. Preoperative comorbidities belong to these risk factors. A risk reduction related to concomitant diseases mostly does not succeed. There is a range of studies comparing the techniques of surgical wound closure. A consensus of these is that a running suture of the fascia with slowly absorbable or non-absorbable sutures results in the lowest incidence of incisional hernias. A one-cm distance between the stitches and a minimal distance of one cm to the fascial margin as well as a 4:1 suture length to wound length ratio are still valid principles. In any case, solely optimising the surgical technique of the abdominal wall closure is not able to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias. Prevention of postoperative complications by adequate pain management, respiratory training and early mobilisation are procedures to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias. However, systematic studies are lacking. To avoid an incisional hernia, only a practical approach remains which, however, does not meet the requirements of evidence-based medicine.

摘要

切口疝是剖腹手术的一种晚期并发症,目前仍缺乏基于证据的预防性方法。术后,切口疝的发生是由多种因素导致的。术前合并症属于这些风险因素。降低与伴发疾病相关的风险大多难以成功。有一系列研究比较了手术伤口缝合技术。这些研究的共识是,使用可缓慢吸收或不可吸收缝线连续缝合筋膜可使切口疝的发生率最低。缝线间距为1厘米、距筋膜边缘至少1厘米以及缝线长度与伤口长度之比为4:1仍然是有效的原则。无论如何,仅优化腹壁闭合的手术技术并不能降低切口疝的发生率。通过适当的疼痛管理、呼吸训练和早期活动来预防术后并发症是降低切口疝发生率的措施。然而,缺乏系统性研究。为避免切口疝,只剩下一种实用方法,但这不符合循证医学的要求。

相似文献

1
[Risk factors and prevention of incisional hernia--what is evidence-based?].[切口疝的危险因素与预防——循证依据是什么?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Sep;133(5):453-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1076961. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
2
Incidence and prevention of ventral incisional hernia.腹壁切口疝的发生率与预防。
J Visc Surg. 2012 Oct;149(5 Suppl):e3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
3
Prevention of incisional hernias: how to close a midline incision.预防切口疝:如何关闭中线切口。
Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Oct;93(5):1027-40. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.009.
4
Incisional hernia after laparotomy: prospective randomized comparison between early-absorbable and late-absorbable suture materials.剖腹术后切口疝:早期可吸收缝线与晚期可吸收缝线材料的前瞻性随机对照研究
World J Surg. 2000 Jun;24(6):747-51; discussion 752. doi: 10.1007/s002689910120.
5
European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions.欧洲疝外科学会腹壁切口缝合指南
Hernia. 2015 Feb;19(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
6
A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence.一项比较一期缝合关闭与补片加强关闭以降低切口疝发生率的双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2013 Oct 28;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-48.
7
Closure of burst abdomen after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of different surgical techniques and later development of incisional hernia.胃肠道大手术后腹壁裂开的闭合——不同手术技术的比较及切口疝的后期发展
Eur J Surg. 1999 Oct;165(10):958-61. doi: 10.1080/110241599750008071.
8
Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions.中线腹部切口缝合技术的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2002 Nov;89(11):1350-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02258.x.
9
Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia.腹壁闭合及随后切口疝形成的相关因素。
Surgeon. 2003 Feb;1(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(03)80004-5.
10
Laparotomy closure techniques: Do surgeons follow the latest guidelines? Results of a questionnaire.剖腹术闭合技术:外科医生是否遵循最新指南?问卷调查结果。
Int J Surg. 2019 Nov;71:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Fascial dehiscence: predictable complication? Development and validation of a risk model: a retrospective cohort study.筋膜切开术:可预测的并发症?风险模型的建立和验证:一项回顾性队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 20;408(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02782-y.
2
Risk factors of venous thromboembolism after incisional ventral hernia repair.切口疝修补术后静脉血栓栓塞症的危险因素。
Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):895-899. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02726-3. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
3
The incidence of incisional hernia after aortic aneurysm is not higher than after benign colorectal interventions: A retrospective control-matched cohort study.
主动脉瘤手术后切口疝的发生率并不高于良性结直肠手术后:一项回顾性对照匹配队列研究。
Gefasschirurgie. 2018;23(Suppl 1):23-31. doi: 10.1007/s00772-018-0390-z. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
4
Incidence of incisional hernia after cesarean delivery: a register-based cohort study.剖宫产术后切口疝的发病率:一项基于登记的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 30;9(9):e108829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108829. eCollection 2014.
5
Incisional hernia rate after open abdomen treatment with negative pressure and delayed primary fascia closure.开放性腹部治疗后采用负压和延迟一期筋膜闭合的切口疝发生率。
Hernia. 2014 Feb;18(1):105-11. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1064-0. Epub 2013 Mar 2.