Baig Waqas Wahid, Nagaraja M V, Varma Muralidhar, Prabhu Ravindra
Department of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct;22(10):825-8. doi: 10.1155/2008/287274.
To study the value of platelet count to spleen diameter ratio as a noninvasive parameter for diagnosing esophageal varices (EVs) in liver cirrhosis.
The laboratory and ultrasonographic variables were prospectively evaluated in 150 patients with liver cirrhosis. Only stable patients were included in the study. Patients with active gastrointestinal bleeding at the time of admission were excluded. All patients underwent screening upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
The platelet count, spleen diameter and platelet count to spleen diameter ratio in patients with EVs were significantly different from patients without EVs. The platelet count to spleen diameter ratio had the highest accuracy among the three parameters. By applying receiver operating characteristic curves, a platelet count to spleen diameter ratio cut-off value of 1014 was obtained, which gave positive and negative predictive values of 95.4% and 95.1%, respectively. The accuracy of this cut-off value as evaluated by applying receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.942 (95% CI 0.890 to 0.995).
Among the noninvasive parameters studied, platelet count to spleen diameter ratio had the highest accuracy for diagnosing EVs. However, the evidence for the noninvasive diagnosis is not yet sufficient to replace endoscopy as a diagnostic screening tool for EVs in all cirrhotic patients. The platelet count to spleen diameter ratio may be a useful tool for diagnosing EVs in liver cirrhosis noninvasively when endoscopy facilities are not available.
研究血小板计数与脾直径比值作为诊断肝硬化食管静脉曲张(EVs)的无创参数的价值。
对150例肝硬化患者的实验室及超声检查变量进行前瞻性评估。仅纳入病情稳定的患者。排除入院时伴有活动性消化道出血的患者。所有患者均接受上消化道内镜筛查。
EVs患者的血小板计数、脾直径及血小板计数与脾直径比值与无EVs患者有显著差异。血小板计数与脾直径比值在这三个参数中准确性最高。通过应用受试者工作特征曲线,得出血小板计数与脾直径比值的截断值为1014,其阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为95.4%和95.1%。应用受试者工作特征曲线评估该截断值的准确性为0.942(95%可信区间0.890至0.995)。
在所研究的无创参数中,血小板计数与脾直径比值对诊断EVs的准确性最高。然而,无创诊断的证据尚不足以取代内镜检查作为所有肝硬化患者EVs的诊断筛查工具。在内镜检查设备不可用时,血小板计数与脾直径比值可能是一种无创诊断肝硬化患者EVs的有用工具。