• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我相关和他人相关谎言背后的神经过程:一项使用功能磁共振成像的个体差异研究方法

Neural processes underlying self- and other-related lies: an individual difference approach using fMRI.

作者信息

Ganis Giorgio, Morris Robert R, Kosslyn Stephen M

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(6):539-53. doi: 10.1080/17470910801928271.

DOI:10.1080/17470910801928271
PMID:18925536
Abstract

Two hypotheses were tested using a novel individual differences approach, which identifies rate-limiting brain regions, that is, brain regions in which variations in neural activity predict variations in behavioral performance. The first hypothesis is that the rate-limiting regions that support the production of lies about oneself (self-related) are partially distinct from those underlying the production of lies about other individuals (other-related). The second hypothesis is that a cingulate-insular-prefrontal network found to be rate-limiting for interference tasks is involved in both types of lies. The results confirmed both hypotheses and supported the utility of this individual differences approach in the study of deception in particular, as well in the study of complex cognitive phenomena more generally.

摘要

我们使用一种新颖的个体差异方法对两个假设进行了检验,该方法能够识别限速脑区,即神经活动的变化可预测行为表现变化的脑区。第一个假设是,支持编造关于自己的谎言(自我相关)的限速脑区与支持编造关于他人的谎言(他人相关)的限速脑区部分不同。第二个假设是,一个被发现对干扰任务具有限速作用的扣带回-脑岛-前额叶网络参与了这两种类型的谎言编造。结果证实了这两个假设,并支持了这种个体差异方法在欺骗研究中,特别是在更广泛的复杂认知现象研究中的效用。

相似文献

1
Neural processes underlying self- and other-related lies: an individual difference approach using fMRI.自我相关和他人相关谎言背后的神经过程:一项使用功能磁共振成像的个体差异研究方法
Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(6):539-53. doi: 10.1080/17470910801928271.
2
Can simultaneously acquired electrodermal activity improve accuracy of fMRI detection of deception?同时获取的皮肤电活动能否提高功能磁共振成像检测欺骗行为的准确性?
Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(6):510-7. doi: 10.1080/17470910801907168.
3
Types of deception revealed by individual differences in cognitive abilities.认知能力个体差异所揭示的欺骗类型。
Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(6):554-69. doi: 10.1080/17470910802299987.
4
Detection of deception using fMRI: better than chance, but well below perfection.使用功能磁共振成像检测欺骗行为:比随机猜测要好,但远未达到完美。
Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(6):528-38. doi: 10.1080/17470910801903530.
5
The production and detection of deception in an interactive game.在互动游戏中产生和检测欺骗。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3619-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.013. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
6
[Technical development of detecting deception].[检测欺骗的技术发展]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Feb 15;23(1):52-6.
7
Speaking of secrets and lies: the contribution of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to vocal deception.说到秘密与谎言:腹外侧前额叶皮层在言语欺骗中的作用。
Neuroimage. 2008 Apr 15;40(3):1411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.035. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
8
Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: application to lie detection.运用机器学习方法对大脑活动的空间模式进行分类:在测谎中的应用。
Neuroimage. 2005 Nov 15;28(3):663-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.009. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
9
Neuroimaging of marijuana smokers during inhibitory processing: a pilot investigation.大麻吸食者在抑制性加工过程中的神经影像学研究:一项初步调查。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Apr;23(1):107-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.016.
10
Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control.故意的虚假反应与反应冲突和认知控制共享神经基础。
Neuroimage. 2005 Mar;25(1):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.041. Epub 2005 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Are older adults more deceived by false advertising? Evidence from intra- and inter-brain connectivity in the prefrontal cortex during face-to-face deceptive sales.老年人是否更容易被虚假广告欺骗?来自面对面欺骗性销售过程中前额叶皮质内脑和脑间连接的证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Jun 17;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf044.
2
The effects of deception on memory: a comparative study of actors and eyewitnesses accounts.欺骗对记忆的影响:演员和目击者证言的比较研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 7;12(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02152-3.
3
Validity of an Instrument to Detect Cheating Confirmed by the Elicited Emotional Reactions.
通过引发的情绪反应确认的检测作弊工具的有效性。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 20;12:635228. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635228. eCollection 2021.
4
The role of anterior prefrontal cortex (area 10) in face-to-face deception measured with fNIRS.使用功能性近红外光谱技术测量面对面欺骗中额前皮质(区域 10)的作用。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Jan 18;16(1-2):129-142. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa086.
5
Lie Detection Using fNIRS Monitoring of Inhibition-Related Brain Regions Discriminates Infrequent but not Frequent Liars.使用功能近红外光谱技术监测与抑制相关脑区进行测谎,能够辨别偶尔说谎者而非经常说谎者。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Mar 13;12:71. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00071. eCollection 2018.
6
Functional neural networks of honesty and dishonesty in children: Evidence from graph theory analysis.儿童诚实和不诚实的功能神经回路:来自图论分析的证据。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 21;7(1):12085. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11754-4.
7
Neural correlates of deception: lying about past events and personal beliefs.欺骗的神经关联:对过去事件和个人信念说谎
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jan 1;12(1):116-127. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw151.
8
Mapping the small-world properties of brain networks in deception with functional near-infrared spectroscopy.利用功能近红外光谱技术绘制欺骗行为中脑网络的小世界特性
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 29;6:25297. doi: 10.1038/srep25297.
9
An electroencephalography network and connectivity analysis for deception in instructed lying tasks.用于指令性说谎任务中欺骗行为的脑电图网络与连通性分析
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 13;10(2):e0116522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116522. eCollection 2015.
10
Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges.基于功能磁共振成像的测谎:科学和社会挑战。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Feb;15(2):123-31. doi: 10.1038/nrn3665.