Suppr超能文献

右顶叶皮层 2 赫兹重复经颅磁刺激 2 周对抑郁症的部分临床反应。

Partial clinical response to 2 weeks of 2 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the right parietal cortex in depression.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Jun;12(5):643-50. doi: 10.1017/S1461145708009553. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

Abstract

The aim of this treatment study was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the right parietal cortex in depression. In a double-blind, sham-controlled design ten consecutive sessions of 2 Hz rTMS (inter-pulse interval 0.5 s) at 90% motor threshold to the right parietal cortex (2400 pulses per session) were applied to 34 patients with the primary diagnosis of DSM-IV depression and a score of > or =15 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD). The primary outcome measures were the percentage change from baseline on the 17-item HAMD scores after ten sessions, and the percentage of clinical (defined as > or =50% reduction in HAMD score) and partial clinical (defined as > or =30% reduction in HAMD score) responders. Reduction of HAMD scores in the real rTMS treatment (mean real+/-S.D., -19.9+/-32.5%) was not statistically different from the sham rTMS treatment (mean sham+/-S.D., -5.6+/-28.4%), and the number of clinical responders did not differ between treatments. However, a significant greater number of partial clinical responders were observed in the real (43.8%) compared to the sham rTMS treatment (6.3%). This study provides the first evidence showing that 2 Hz rTMS over the right parietal cortex may have antidepressant properties, and warrants further research.

摘要

本治疗研究旨在评估重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对右顶叶的治疗效果。在一项双盲、假刺激对照设计中,对 34 名符合 DSM-IV 抑郁诊断标准且汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分>或=15 分的患者,采用 2Hz rTMS(脉冲间隔 0.5s,刺激强度为 90%运动阈值),刺激右顶叶,共 10 个疗程,每个疗程 2400 个脉冲。主要的观察指标是治疗 10 个疗程后 HAMD17 项评分的基线百分比变化,以及临床(定义为 HAMD 评分降低>或=50%)和部分临床(定义为 HAMD 评分降低>或=30%)应答者的百分比。实际 rTMS 治疗组(HAMD 评分的实际变化+/-标准差,-19.9+/-32.5%)与假刺激 rTMS 治疗组(HAMD 评分的假变化+/-标准差,-5.6+/-28.4%)的 HAMD 评分降低没有统计学差异,两种治疗方法的临床应答者数量也没有差异。然而,实际 rTMS 治疗组(43.8%)部分临床应答者的数量明显多于假刺激 rTMS 治疗组(6.3%)。本研究首次提供了证据表明,2Hz rTMS 刺激右顶叶可能具有抗抑郁作用,值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验