Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2024;66:233-277. doi: 10.1007/7854_2024_483.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is entering increasingly widespread use in treating depression. The most common stimulation target, in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), emerged from early neuroimaging studies in depression. Recently, more rigorous casual methods have revealed whole-brain target networks and anti-networks based on the effects of focal brain lesions and focal brain stimulation on depression symptoms. Symptom improvement during therapeutic DLPFC-TMS appears to involve directional changes in signaling between the DLPFC, subgenual and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and salience-network regions. However, different networks may be involved in the therapeutic mechanisms for other TMS targets in depression, such as dorsomedial prefrontal cortex or orbitofrontal cortex. The durability of therapeutic effects for TMS involves synaptic neuroplasticity, and specifically may depend upon dopamine acting at the D1 receptor family, as well as NMDA-receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity mechanisms. Although TMS protocols are classically considered 'excitatory' or 'inhibitory', the actual effects in individuals appear quite variable, and might be better understood at the level of populations of synapses rather than individual synapses. Synaptic meta-plasticity may provide a built-in protective mechanism to avoid runaway facilitation or inhibition during treatment, and may account for the relatively small number of patients who worsen rather than improve with TMS. From an ethological perspective, the antidepressant effects of TMS may involve promoting a whole-brain attractor state associated with foraging/hunting behaviors, centered on the rostrolateral periaqueductal gray and salience network, and suppressing an attractor state associated with passive threat defense, centered on the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray and default-mode network.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)在治疗抑郁症方面的应用越来越广泛。最常见的刺激靶点是背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC),这一靶点源自于抑郁症的早期神经影像学研究。最近,更严格的因果方法揭示了基于局灶性脑损伤和局灶性脑刺激对抑郁症状影响的全脑靶标网络和拮抗网络。在治疗性 DLPFC-TMS 期间,症状改善似乎涉及 DLPFC、扣带回下侧和背侧前部、突显网络区域之间信号的定向变化。然而,不同的网络可能涉及抑郁症中其他 TMS 靶点的治疗机制,如背内侧前额叶皮层或眶额皮层。TMS 治疗效果的持久性涉及突触神经可塑性,具体而言,可能取决于多巴胺作用于 D1 受体家族,以及 NMDA 受体依赖性突触可塑性机制。尽管 TMS 方案通常被认为是“兴奋性”或“抑制性”的,但个体的实际效果差异很大,在突触群体层面上可能比在单个突触层面上更容易理解。突触元可塑性可能提供一种内置的保护机制,以避免在治疗过程中出现失控的促进或抑制,并可能解释为什么相对较少的患者在接受 TMS 治疗后病情恶化而不是改善。从行为学的角度来看,TMS 的抗抑郁作用可能涉及促进与觅食/捕猎行为相关的全脑吸引子状态,该状态以喙侧外侧导水管周围灰质和突显网络为中心,并抑制与被动威胁防御相关的吸引子状态,以腹外侧导水管周围灰质和默认模式网络为中心。