Praygod George, de Frey Albie, Eisenhut Michael
National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Malar J. 2008 Oct 17;7:210. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-210.
The efficacy of intravenous quinine, which is the mainstay for treating severe malaria in children, is decreasing in South East Asia and Africa. Artemisinin derivatives are a potential alternative to quinine. However, their efficacy compared to quinine in treating severe malaria in children is not clearly understood. The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy of parenteral artemisinin derivatives versus parenteral quinine in treating severe malaria in children.
All randomized controlled studies comparing parenteral artemisinin derivatives with parenteral quinine in treating severe malaria in children were included in the review. Data bases searched were: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2008), EMBASE (1980 to February 2008), and LILACS (1982 to February 2008). Dichotomous variables were compared using risk ratios (RR) and the continuous data using weighted mean difference (WMD).
Twelve trials were included (1,524 subjects). There was no difference in mortality between artemisinin derivatives and quinine (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.12). The artemisinin derivatives resolved coma faster than quinine (WMD = -4.61, 95% CI: -7.21 to -2.00, fixed effect model), but when trials with adequate concealment only were considered this differences disappeared. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in parasite clearance time, fever clearance time, incidence of neurological sequelae and 28th day cure rate. One trial reported significantly more local reactions at the injection site with intramuscular quinine compared to artemether. None of the trials was adequately powered to demonstrate equivalence.
There was no evidence that treatment of children with severe malaria with parenteral artemisinin derivatives was associated with lower mortality or long-term morbidity compared to parenteral quinine. Future studies require adequately powered equivalence trial design to decide whether both drugs are equally effective.
静脉注射奎宁是治疗儿童重症疟疾的主要药物,但在东南亚和非洲其疗效正在下降。青蒿素衍生物是奎宁的一种潜在替代药物。然而,与奎宁相比,它们在治疗儿童重症疟疾方面的疗效尚不清楚。本综述的目的是评估胃肠外青蒿素衍生物与胃肠外奎宁治疗儿童重症疟疾的疗效。
本综述纳入了所有比较胃肠外青蒿素衍生物与胃肠外奎宁治疗儿童重症疟疾的随机对照研究。检索的数据库有:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(2007年第4期Cochrane图书馆)、MEDLINE(1966年至2008年2月)、EMBASE(1980年至2008年2月)和LILACS(1982年至2008年2月)。二分变量采用风险比(RR)进行比较,连续数据采用加权平均差(WMD)进行比较。
纳入12项试验(1524名受试者)。青蒿素衍生物与奎宁的死亡率无差异(RR = 0.90,95%CI 0.73至1.12)。青蒿素衍生物使昏迷缓解的速度比奎宁快(WMD = -4.61,95%CI:-7.21至-2.00,固定效应模型),但仅考虑具有充分隐匿性的试验时,这种差异消失。两组在寄生虫清除时间、发热清除时间、神经后遗症发生率和第28天治愈率方面无统计学显著差异。一项试验报告称,与蒿甲醚相比,肌肉注射奎宁时注射部位的局部反应明显更多。没有一项试验有足够的效力来证明等效性。
没有证据表明与胃肠外奎宁相比,胃肠外青蒿素衍生物治疗儿童重症疟疾与更低的死亡率或长期发病率相关。未来的研究需要有足够效力的等效性试验设计来确定这两种药物是否同样有效。