Adam I, Idris H M, Mohamed-Ali A A, Aelbasit I A, Elbashir M I
New Halfa Hospital, New Halfa, Sudan.
East Afr Med J. 2002 Dec;79(12):621-5. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v79i12.8668.
To compare the efficacy of intramuscular artemether and intravenous quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria.
An open randomized controlled clinical trial.
New Halfa Teaching Hospital, Eastern Sudan, in the period November 2001-January 2002.
Forty one male and female children; 21 on artemether and 20 on quinine.
Fever clearance time, parasite clearance time, coma resolution time and side effects of the two drugs.
The two groups (artemether and quinine) were well matched in the admission variable. The mean +/- (SD) fever clearance time was 30.5 +/- (20.9) hours in the artemether group, while it was 18.0 +/- (8.1) hours in the quinine group; the difference was highly significant (P=0.02). The mean parasite clearance time was shorter in the artemether group than in the quinine group, but it was not statistically significant, (16.0 vs. 22.4 hours; p>0.05). In comatose patients (three in the artemether group, three in the quinine group) the time of recovery from coma was significantly shorter in artemether group than in quinine group (12.5 vs. 20.16 hours; P<0.05). Recrudescence of P. falciparum (confirmed by polymerase chain reaction) occurred in one out of fifteen patients (6.6%) in the quinine group seen on day 28, which was successfully treated by sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine. In the quinine group, one patient died and one patient developed hypoglycaemia.
Artemether caused faster parasite clearance than quinine, but quinine lowered the temperature in shorter time than artemether. The results obtained show that artemether can be used as safe and effective alternative drug for the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in the wake of the growing resistance to quinine in Sudan.
比较肌肉注射蒿甲醚和静脉注射奎宁治疗重症恶性疟的疗效。
开放性随机对照临床试验。
苏丹东部的新哈尔法教学医院,时间为2001年11月至2002年1月。
41名男女儿童;21名使用蒿甲醚,20名使用奎宁。
发热清除时间、寄生虫清除时间、昏迷苏醒时间以及两种药物的副作用。
两组(蒿甲醚组和奎宁组)在入院变量方面匹配良好。蒿甲醚组的平均发热清除时间为30.5±(20.9)小时,而奎宁组为18.0±(8.1)小时;差异具有高度显著性(P = 0.02)。蒿甲醚组的平均寄生虫清除时间比奎宁组短,但无统计学意义(16.0小时对22.4小时;p>0.05)。在昏迷患者中(蒿甲醚组3例,奎宁组3例),蒿甲醚组从昏迷中苏醒的时间显著短于奎宁组(12.5小时对20.16小时;P<0.05)。在第28天复诊时,奎宁组15名患者中有1名(6.6%)出现恶性疟原虫复发(经聚合酶链反应确认),用磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶成功治疗。在奎宁组,1例患者死亡,1例患者发生低血糖。
蒿甲醚比奎宁能更快清除寄生虫,但奎宁降低体温的时间比蒿甲醚短。所获得的结果表明,鉴于苏丹对奎宁的耐药性不断增加,蒿甲醚可作为治疗重症恶性疟的安全有效替代药物。