Scuderi G L, Cesareo M, Perdicchi A, Recupero S M
University of Rome La Sapienza, S. Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1033, 00100 Rome, Italy.
Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:77-99. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)01107-2.
Despite increasingly sophisticated techniques for the computerized analysis of the optic nerve and retinal nerve fiber layer, standard automated perimetry (SAP) is still the primary test for assessing functional damage in glaucoma. Most of the diseases affecting the visual field can be studied analyzing the central visual field with a fixed grid of points set at 6 degrees or at a variable density within central 30 degrees, using a III white target stimulus (program 30/2 or 24/2 Humphrey, G1/G2 or 30/2 Octopus). Although there is lack of a true gold standard for glaucoma, SAP results were the primary endpoint in most of the clinical trials in glaucoma. New thresholding strategies allowed a considerable reduction of examination time without substantial loss of accuracy. Moreover, recent findings on structure-function correlation in glaucoma validate the clinical role of this well-known and widespread method of examination.
尽管用于视神经和视网膜神经纤维层计算机分析的技术日益复杂,但标准自动视野计(SAP)仍是评估青光眼功能损害的主要检测方法。大多数影响视野的疾病可通过使用III级白色目标刺激(程序30/2或24/2 Humphrey、G1/G2或30/2 Octopus),分析中央视野中以6度设置的固定点网格或中央30度内的可变密度来进行研究。尽管缺乏青光眼的真正金标准,但SAP结果是大多数青光眼临床试验的主要终点。新的阈值策略在不显著降低准确性的情况下,使检查时间大幅缩短。此外,青光眼结构-功能相关性的最新研究结果证实了这种广为人知且应用广泛的检查方法的临床作用。