de la Rosette J J M C H, Zuazu J Rioja, Tsakiris P, Elsakka A M, Zudaire J J, Laguna M P, de Reijke Th M
Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Urol. 2008 Dec;180(6):2489-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.025. Epub 2008 Oct 19.
We stratified factors affecting treatment morbidity, compared the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures from a single department and provided evidence of treatment benefits when percutaneous nephrolithotomy is performed in an expert setting.
Since the department became a dedicated endourological center in 2002 we grouped all percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures into those performed before 2002 (group 1) and after 2002 (group 2). The modified Clavien classification was used to score morbidity. Independent variables with an influence on complications were studied including stone size, operating time, operative complications, dilation device, urine culture, group allocation and lithotripsy device. Contingency and logistic regression were used for univariate and multivariate analysis.
Of the 244 percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures 68 comprised group 1 and 176 formed group 2. Statistical preoperative differences were patient age, the use of anticoagulants and positive urinary cultures. Group 1 had a complication rate of 56.8% and group 2 had a complication rate of 37.2%. There were significant differences between the groups (p = 0.007). Almost all complications were grade 1 to 2. On univariate analysis the influence variables were urine culture (OR 1.69), group allocation (OR 2.20), stone size (OR 2.28), dilation device (OR 4.8), lithotripsy device (OR 1.22), perioperative complications (OR 2.83) and surgical time (OR 1.87). On multivariate analysis the independent factors in the complicated outcome were stone size (OR 1.25), type of lithotripsy device (OR 1.35) and incidence of perioperative complications (OR 3.71).
The dedicated setting for percutaneous nephrolithotomy at our center resulted in decreased operative time, more uneventful procedures and decreased hospitalization time. The modified Clavien morbidity score is a reliable tool for more objective outcome comparisons after renal stone treatment.
我们对影响治疗并发症发生率的因素进行分层,比较了同一科室经皮肾镜取石术的治疗结果,并提供了在专家环境下进行经皮肾镜取石术时治疗获益的证据。
自该科室于2002年成为专门的腔内泌尿外科中心以来,我们将所有经皮肾镜取石术分为2002年之前进行的手术(第1组)和2002年之后进行的手术(第2组)。采用改良的Clavien分类法对并发症发生率进行评分。研究了对并发症有影响的独立变量,包括结石大小、手术时间、手术并发症、扩张器械、尿培养、分组及碎石器械。采用列联表分析和逻辑回归进行单因素和多因素分析。
244例经皮肾镜取石术中,68例属于第1组,176例属于第2组。术前统计学差异在于患者年龄、抗凝剂的使用及尿培养阳性情况。第1组的并发症发生率为56.8%,第2组为37.2%。两组间存在显著差异(p = 0.007)。几乎所有并发症均为1至2级。单因素分析中,有影响的变量为尿培养(OR 1.69)、分组(OR 2.20)、结石大小(OR 2.28)、扩张器械(OR 4.8)、碎石器械(OR 1.22)、围手术期并发症(OR 2.83)及手术时间(OR 1.87)。多因素分析中,导致复杂结局的独立因素为结石大小(OR 1.25)、碎石器械类型(OR 1.35)及围手术期并发症发生率(OR 3.71)。
我们中心经皮肾镜取石术的专门设置缩短了手术时间,使手术过程更顺利,并缩短了住院时间。改良的Clavien并发症评分是肾结石治疗后进行更客观结局比较的可靠工具。