Favaloro E J, Grispo L, Exner T, Koutts J
Department of Haematology, ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1991 Apr;2(2):285-91. doi: 10.1097/00001721-199104000-00011.
We have developed and evaluated an ELISA-based collagen binding assay (CBA) as an aid in the diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand's disease (vWD). The assay is simple to perform, and appears capable of differentiating Type II vWD from Type I vWD. Using plasma samples from both affected and non-affected patients, or from normal individuals, data obtained using the CBA were directly compared to data simultaneously derived from a standard von Willebrand factor antigen (protein; vWFAg) ELISA, and from a standard ristocetin cofactor (RCof) assay. Plasma derived from vWD patients (both Type I and Type II) showed overall reduced levels of vWF as detected by all three assays. Mean levels as a per cent of normal for vWFAg, CBA, RCof were 47.3, 60.7, 31.1 for Type I patients (n = 37), and 34.9, 1.6, 11.9 for Type II patients (n = 16) respectively. However despite the reduced vWF levels detected in Type I vWF binding values for both the CBA and vWFAg showed near comparability (i.e. vWFAg:CBA ratio generally less than or equal to 1.0). These ratio values were thus similar to those observed using plasma derived from either individual normal donors, or from non-vWD affected patients. On the other hand, plasma from Type II vWD affected patients showed markedly disparent values, with increased (greater than 8.0) vWFAg:CBA ratios coincident with virtually absent CBA binding in these patients. Thus, the CBA as reported here does appear to constitute a novel functional assay capable of detecting qualitative vWF differences in plasma of affected vWD patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们开发并评估了一种基于酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的胶原蛋白结合试验(CBA),以辅助血管性血友病(vWD)的诊断和分类。该试验操作简单,似乎能够区分2型vWD和1型vWD。使用来自患病和未患病患者或正常个体的血浆样本,将使用CBA获得的数据直接与同时从标准血管性血友病因子抗原(蛋白质;vWFAg)ELISA和标准瑞斯托霉素辅因子(RCof)试验获得的数据进行比较。所有三种试验均检测到,vWD患者(1型和2型)的血浆中vWF水平总体降低。1型患者(n = 37)的vWFAg、CBA、RCof相对于正常水平的平均百分比分别为47.3、60.7、31.1,2型患者(n = 16)分别为34.9、1.6、11.9。然而,尽管在1型vWD中检测到vWF水平降低,但CBA和vWFAg的vWF结合值显示出近乎可比性(即vWFAg:CBA比值通常小于或等于1.0)。因此,这些比值与使用个体正常供体或未患vWD患者的血浆观察到的比值相似。另一方面,2型vWD患者的血浆显示出明显不同的值,vWFAg:CBA比值升高(大于8.0),且这些患者几乎没有CBA结合。因此,本文报道的CBA似乎确实构成了一种新型功能试验,能够检测受影响的vWD患者血浆中vWF的定性差异。(摘要截短于250字)