Burgess Hilary, Wood Darren
Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph.
Can J Vet Res. 2008 Oct;72(5):420-7.
No single test is comprehensive enough to detect all of the variants of von Willebrand Disease (VWD), making determination of both concentration and function of von Willebrand Factor (VWF) important for an accurate diagnosis. The objective of the study was to validate a newly developed VWF collagen binding assay (VWF:CB) and VWF antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) developed at the Ontario Veterinary College (OVC VWF:Ag). Linearity, sensitivity, and coefficients of variation were determined. The Asserachrom VWF:Ag ELISA was used as the reference assay for this study. Concordance correlation and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement between both VWF:Ag assays. The VWF:CB accuracy was assessed by degree of association with the VWF:Ag assays, and the VWF:Ag to VWF:CB ratio. All assays were assessed for their ability to distinguish between VWD negative and VWD positive patients. Linearity, intra-assay coefficients of variation, and inter-assay coefficients of variation were acceptable for both the newly developed VWF:CB (R2 = 0.97, average CV = 4.4, and 15, respectively) and OVC VWF:Ag assays (R2 = 0.96, average CV = 7.9, and 5.9, respectively). Agreement between the OVC VWF:Ag assay and reference assay was excellent (rho(c) = 0.89), and although differences between assay results precluded interchangeable use of the assays, both successfully distinguished VWD positive and VWD negative dogs (P < 0.0001). The VWF:CB showed a strong association with both VWF:Ag assays (R2 = 0.86, 0.82) and VWF:Ag to VWF:CB ratios (< or = 1) were as expected. The excellent performance of both assays in this validation study confirm their reliability and potential for clinical application.
没有任何一项单一检测能够全面到足以检测出所有类型的血管性血友病(VWD)变体,因此,确定血管性血友病因子(VWF)的浓度和功能对于准确诊断至关重要。本研究的目的是验证安大略兽医学院新开发的VWF胶原结合试验(VWF:CB)和VWF抗原酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)(OVC VWF:Ag)。测定了线性、灵敏度和变异系数。本研究使用Asserachrom VWF:Ag ELISA作为参考检测方法。采用一致性相关性和Bland-Altman图来评估两种VWF:Ag检测方法之间的一致性。通过与VWF:Ag检测方法的关联程度以及VWF:Ag与VWF:CB的比值来评估VWF:CB的准确性。评估了所有检测方法区分VWD阴性和VWD阳性患者的能力。新开发的VWF:CB检测方法(R2 = 0.97,平均变异系数分别为4.4和15)和OVC VWF:Ag检测方法(R2 = 0.96,平均变异系数分别为7.9和5.9)的线性、批内变异系数和批间变异系数均符合要求。OVC VWF:Ag检测方法与参考检测方法之间的一致性极佳(rho(c) = 0.89),尽管检测结果之间的差异使得这些检测方法无法互换使用,但两者均成功区分了VWD阳性和VWD阴性犬(P < 0.0001)。VWF:CB与两种VWF:Ag检测方法均显示出强相关性(R2 = 0.86, 0.82),且VWF:Ag与VWF:CB的比值(≤1)符合预期。两种检测方法在本验证研究中的出色表现证实了它们的可靠性和临床应用潜力。