Suppr超能文献

商业化表型分析系统、抗菌药物敏感性测试以及基于tuf基因序列的基因分型在从牛乳腺炎病例中分离出的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌种水平鉴定中的比较

Comparison of a commercialized phenotyping system, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and tuf gene sequence-based genotyping for species-level identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from cases of bovine mastitis.

作者信息

Capurro A, Artursson K, Waller K Persson, Bengtsson B, Ericsson-Unnerstad H, Aspán A

机构信息

National Veterinary Institute, SE-75189 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Vet Microbiol. 2009 Mar 2;134(3-4):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.08.028. Epub 2008 Sep 7.

Abstract

In order to evaluate the usefulness of some phenotypic and genotypic methods for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), isolates were obtained from bovine cases of clinical and sub-clinical mastitis from different geographical areas in Sweden. By using the Staph-Zym test, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and sequencing of part of the CNS tuf gene and, when needed, part of the 16S rRNA gene we characterized 82 clinical isolates and 24 reference strains of 18 different species of staphylococci. The genotypic methods identified nine different species of CNS among the 82 milk isolates. A comparison with results obtained by tuf gene sequencing showed that Staph-Zym correctly identified CNS reference strains to species level more often than bovine milk CNS isolates (83% and 61%, respectively). In addition, tests supplementary to the Staph-Zym were frequently needed in both groups of isolates (50% of reference strains and 33% of milk isolates) to obtain an identification of the strain. It is notable that Staph-Zym judged two isolates as CNS, although they belonged to other species, could not give a species name in 11% of the bovine CNS isolates, and gave 28% of the isolates an incorrect species name. The present study indicates that the studied phenotypic methods are unreliable for identification of CNS from bovine intra-mammary infections.

摘要

为了评估一些表型和基因型方法对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)进行菌种鉴定的实用性,从瑞典不同地理区域的临床和亚临床乳腺炎牛病例中获取了分离株。通过使用葡萄球菌酶试验、抗菌药敏试验以及对CNS的tuf基因部分进行测序,并在需要时对16S rRNA基因部分进行测序,我们对82株临床分离株和18种不同葡萄球菌的24株参考菌株进行了特征分析。基因型方法在82株牛奶分离株中鉴定出9种不同的CNS菌种。与通过tuf基因测序获得的结果进行比较表明,葡萄球菌酶试验对CNS参考菌株进行菌种水平鉴定的正确率高于牛乳CNS分离株(分别为83%和61%)。此外,在两组分离株中(50%的参考菌株和33%的牛奶分离株),经常需要进行葡萄球菌酶试验之外的补充试验才能鉴定菌株。值得注意的是,葡萄球菌酶试验将两株不属于CNS的分离株判定为CNS,在11%的牛CNS分离株中无法给出菌种名称,并且给28%的分离株给出了错误的菌种名称。本研究表明,所研究的表型方法对于从牛乳腺内感染中鉴定CNS是不可靠的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验