Chien Andy, Eliav Eli, Sterling Michele
Division of Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Mayne Medical School, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Clin J Pain. 2008 Nov-Dec;24(9):759-66. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181773b95.
In contrast to the increasing knowledge of the sensory dysfunction involved in chronic whiplash associated disorders, the use of comprehensive quantitative sensory testing in the acute stage of the condition is sparse. In this study, we sought to investigate the presence of sensory hypoesthesia in participants with acute whiplash injury.
Fifty-two volunteers within 4 weeks after a motor vehicle accident and 31 healthy asymptomatic volunteers were recruited for this study. We classified our cohort into either a "high-risk" (n=17; signs associated with poor recovery including Neck Disability Index scores >30, cold and mechanical hyperalgesia, heightened brachial plexus provocation test responses) or "low-risk" group (without these signs). Detection thresholds to electrical, thermal, and vibration stimuli measured in lower cervical nerve root innervation zones and psychologic distress and posttraumatic stress symptoms were compared between the groups using multivariate analysis of covariance.
Both the high-risk and low-risk groups exhibited significant elevation in sensory detection when compared with controls (P<0.05). There was no difference in detection thresholds between the 2 whiplash groups, except for electrical detection which was greater in the high-risk group (P>0.05). Both groups were psychologically distressed.
Our findings demonstrate generalized hypoesthesia in acute whiplash associated disorders suggesting adaptive central nervous system processing mechanisms are involved, regardless of pain and disability. The elevated levels of psychologic distress seen in both groups may also play a role.
与慢性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病中感觉功能障碍的认识不断增加形成对比的是,在该疾病急性期使用全面定量感觉测试的情况很少见。在本研究中,我们试图调查急性挥鞭样损伤参与者中感觉减退的存在情况。
招募了52名机动车事故后4周内的志愿者和31名健康无症状志愿者参与本研究。我们将队列分为“高风险”组(n = 17;与恢复不良相关的体征,包括颈部残疾指数评分>30、冷和机械性痛觉过敏、臂丛神经激发试验反应增强)或“低风险”组(无这些体征)。使用多变量协方差分析比较两组在下颈神经根支配区测量的电、热和振动刺激检测阈值以及心理困扰和创伤后应激症状。
与对照组相比,高风险组和低风险组的感觉检测均显著升高(P<0.05)。两个挥鞭样损伤组之间的检测阈值没有差异,除了高风险组的电检测更高(P>0.05)。两组均存在心理困扰。
我们的研究结果表明,急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病中存在全身性感觉减退,提示涉及适应性中枢神经系统处理机制,无论疼痛和残疾情况如何。两组中均出现的心理困扰水平升高也可能起作用。