Chung Vincent Chi Ho, Lau Chun Hong, Wong Eric Ming Chung, Yeoh Eng Kiong, Griffiths Sian Meryl
School of Public Health, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.
Health Policy. 2009 Apr;90(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Oct 19.
This study investigates differences in perceived communication by patients of the quality of outpatient episodes in an urban Chinese population.
A representative, population based survey was conducted in Hong Kong, China. A random sample of respondents aged >15 years who had received outpatient care the 30 days previous to enumeration were invited to evaluate communication with their doctors and the overall quality of their latest consultation.
The majority thought that their clinicians were listening carefully (93.5%), explaining clearly (93.1%), expressing appropriate respect (93.8%), and were allocating sufficient time for consultation (89.5%). 97.6% gave 5-10 points out of 10 for overall healthcare quality. Compared to users of private western medicine (WM) services, multivariate analysis showed that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) patients were more likely to rate their clinicians highly for listening skills but low for respect. Users of WM public services were more likely to be dissatisfied with all evaluated aspects. Favourable ratings were more likely to be expressed by those who are older, less educated, and those who paid by indemnity insurance.
We have highlighted three unique observations: first, patients' perception of clinician-patient communication in out patients differs between WM and TCM. Second, patients who used public WM services rate the quality of their visits lower than those in the private WM sector. Lastly, we have observed a negative association between higher education background and satisfaction level. Further researches are warranted.
本研究调查中国城市人口中患者对门诊就医质量的感知沟通差异。
在中国香港进行了一项具有代表性的基于人群的调查。邀请在统计前30天接受过门诊治疗的15岁以上随机抽样受访者评估与医生的沟通情况以及他们最近一次会诊的总体质量。
大多数人认为他们的临床医生认真倾听(93.5%)、解释清楚(93.1%)、表达了适当的尊重(93.8%)并且为会诊留出了足够的时间(89.5%)。97.6%的人对整体医疗质量给出了5至10分(满分10分)。与使用私立西医服务的患者相比,多变量分析显示,中医患者更有可能对临床医生的倾听技巧给予高分,但对尊重方面给予低分。使用西医公共服务的患者更有可能对所有评估方面不满意。年龄较大、受教育程度较低以及通过医疗保险付费的人更有可能给出好评。
我们突出了三个独特的观察结果:第一,西医和中医门诊患者对医患沟通的感知存在差异。第二,使用西医公共服务的患者对就诊质量的评价低于私立西医部门的患者。最后,我们观察到高等教育背景与满意度之间存在负相关。有必要进行进一步研究。