Burroughs Lauri M, O'Donnell Paul V, Sandmaier Brenda M, Storer Barry E, Luznik Leo, Symons Heather J, Jones Richard J, Ambinder Richard F, Maris Michael B, Blume Karl G, Niederwieser Dietger W, Bruno Benedetto, Maziarz Richard T, Pulsipher Michael A, Petersen Finn B, Storb Rainer, Fuchs Ephraim J, Maloney David G
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Nov;14(11):1279-87. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.08.014.
We compared the outcome of nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) based on donor cell source. Ninety patients with HL were treated with nonmyeloablative conditioning followed by HCT from HLA-matched related, n=38, unrelated, n=24, or HLA-haploidentical related, n=28 donors. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 5 regimens and most patients had failed autologous HCT (92%) and local radiation therapy (83%). With a median follow-up of 25 months, 2-year overall survivals, progression-free survivals (OS)/(PFS), and incidences of relapsed/progressive disease were 53%, 23%, and 56% (HLA-matched related), 58%, 29%, and 63% (unrelated), and 58%, 51%, and 40% (HLA-haploidentical related), respectively. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was significantly lower for HLA-haploidentical related (P=.02) recipients compared to HLA-matched related recipients. There were also significantly decreased risks of relapse for HLA-haploidentical related recipients compared to HLA-matched related (P=.01) and unrelated (P=.03) recipients. The incidences of acute grades III-IV and extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD, cGVHD) were 16%/50% (HLA-matched related), 8%/63% (unrelated), and 11%/35% (HLA-haploidentical related). These data suggested that salvage allogeneic HCT using nonmyeloablative conditioning provided antitumor activity in patients with advanced HL; however, disease relapse/progression continued to be major problems. Importantly, alternative donor stem cell sources are a viable option.
我们基于供体细胞来源,比较了非清髓性异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)治疗复发或难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)患者的疗效。90例HL患者接受了非清髓性预处理,随后接受来自HLA匹配的亲属供者(n = 38)、非亲属供者(n = 24)或HLA单倍型相合的亲属供者(n = 28)的HCT。患者接受了大量预处理,中位治疗方案数为5种,大多数患者自体HCT(92%)和局部放射治疗(83%)均失败。中位随访25个月时,2年总生存率、无进展生存率(OS)/(PFS)以及复发/进展性疾病发生率在HLA匹配的亲属供者组分别为53%、23%和56%,非亲属供者组分别为58%、29%和63%,HLA单倍型相合的亲属供者组分别为58%、51%和40%。与HLA匹配的亲属供者受者相比,HLA单倍型相合的亲属供者受者的非复发死亡率(NRM)显著更低(P = 0.02)。与HLA匹配的亲属供者(P = 0.01)和非亲属供者(P = 0.03)受者相比,HLA单倍型相合的亲属供者受者的复发风险也显著降低。急性III - IV级和广泛慢性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD,cGVHD)的发生率在HLA匹配的亲属供者组为16%/50%,非亲属供者组为8%/63%,HLA单倍型相合的亲属供者组为11%/35%。这些数据表明,采用非清髓性预处理的挽救性异基因HCT为晚期HL患者提供了抗肿瘤活性;然而,疾病复发/进展仍然是主要问题。重要的是,替代供体干细胞来源是一个可行的选择。