Barrios Cristobal, Tran Tuan, Malinoski Darren, Lekawa Michael, Dolich Matthew, Lush Stephanie, Hoyt David, Cinat Marianne E
University of California, Irvine, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, Orange, California, USA.
Am Surg. 2008 Oct;74(10):958-61.
The objective of this study was to determine whether tube thoracostomy can be safely avoided in a subset of patients with blunt occult pneumothorax. A retrospective review was performed. Management without tube thoracostomy was attempted for 59 occult pneumothoraces and was successful in 51 (86%). Observation was successful in 16 of 20 occult pneumothoraces (80%) exposed to positive pressure ventilation within 72 hours of admission. Eight delayed tube thoracostomies were required an average of 19.7 hours post admission. Patients who failed observant management had more significant physiologic derangement on admission (revised trauma score 6.96 vs 7.66, P = 0.04), were more likely to have significant multisystem trauma (88% vs 37%, P = 0.007), but were not more likely to require positive pressure ventilation (PPV) (50% vs 31%, P = 0.31). This study demonstrates that a subset of patients with blunt occult pneumothorax requiring positive pressure ventilation may be safely managed without tube thoracostomy.
本研究的目的是确定在一部分钝性隐匿性气胸患者中是否可以安全地避免进行胸腔闭式引流。进行了一项回顾性研究。对59例隐匿性气胸患者尝试不进行胸腔闭式引流治疗,其中51例(86%)成功。在入院72小时内接受正压通气的20例隐匿性气胸患者中,16例(80%)观察成功。8例患者在入院后平均19.7小时需要延迟进行胸腔闭式引流。观察性治疗失败的患者入院时生理紊乱更明显(修正创伤评分6.96对7.66,P = 0.04),更有可能发生严重的多系统创伤(88%对37%,P = 0.007),但需要正压通气(PPV)的可能性并不更高(50%对31%,P = 0.31)。本研究表明,一部分需要正压通气的钝性隐匿性气胸患者可以在不进行胸腔闭式引流的情况下得到安全治疗。