Phytopathology. 2001 Jan;91(1):84-91. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.1.84.
ABSTRACT A survey for viruses in rose propagated in Europe resulted in detection of only Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV) among seven viruses screened. Four percent of cut-flower roses from different sources were infected with PNRSV. Progression of the disease under greenhouse conditions was very slow, which should make this virus easy to eradicate through sanitary selection. Comparison of the partial coat protein gene sequences for three representative rose isolates indicated that they do not form a distinct phylogenetic group and show close relations to Prunus spp. isolates. However, a comparison of the reactivity of monoclonal antibodies raised against these isolates showed that the most prevalent PNRSV serotype in rose was different from the most prevalent serotype in Prunus spp. All of the 27 rose isolates tested infected P. persica seedlings, whereas three of the four PNRSV isolates tested from Prunus spp. were poorly infectious in Rosa indica plants. These data suggest adaptation of PNRSV isolates from Prunus spp., but not from rose, to their host plants. The test methodologies developed here to evaluate PNRSV pathogenicity in Prunus spp. and rose could also help to screen for resistant genotypes.
摘要 在对欧洲地区栽培的玫瑰进行病毒调查时,仅在筛选的七种病毒中检测到李坏死环斑病毒(PNRSV)。来自不同来源的 4%切花玫瑰受到 PNRSV 的感染。在温室条件下,该疾病的发展非常缓慢,这应该使得通过卫生选择来根除这种病毒变得容易。对三个代表性玫瑰分离物的部分外壳蛋白基因序列的比较表明,它们不形成一个独特的系统发育群,并且与李属分离物密切相关。然而,对针对这些分离物产生的单克隆抗体的反应性的比较表明,玫瑰中最流行的 PNRSV 血清型与李属中最流行的血清型不同。测试的 27 个玫瑰分离物均感染了桃苗,而从李属测试的四个 PNRSV 分离物中的三个在印度月季植株中感染性较差。这些数据表明,来自李属的 PNRSV 分离物适应了其宿主植物,但来自玫瑰的分离物则没有。此处开发的用于评估 PNRSV 在李属和玫瑰中致病性的测试方法也有助于筛选抗性基因型。