Jones R Kevin, Caldwell James E, Brull Sorin J, Soto Roy G
Accurate Clinical Trials/Saddleback Memorial Medical Center, Laguna Hills, CA 92653, USA.
Anesthesiology. 2008 Nov;109(5):816-24. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818a3fee.
Traditionally, reversal of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents was achieved using acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, but these are unable to adequately reverse profound blockade. Sugammadex is a novel reversal agent, reversing the effects of rocuronium by encapsulation. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade.
This phase III, randomized study enrolled surgical patients, aged 18 yr or older with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-IV. Patients were randomized to receive sugammadex (4.0 mg/kg) or neostigmine (70 microg/kg) plus glycopyrrolate (14 microg/kg). Anesthetized patients received an intubating dose of rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), with maintenance doses (0.15 mg/kg) as required. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed by acceleromyography. Sugammadex or neostigmine was administered at reappearance of 1-2 posttetanic counts (profound neuromuscular blockade). The primary efficacy parameter was the time from sugammadex or neostigmine-glycopyrrolate administration to return of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9.
In the intent-to-treat population (n = 37 in each group), geometric mean time to recovery to a train-of-four ratio of 0.9 with sugammadex was 2.9 min versus 50.4 min with neostigmine-glycopyrrolate (P < 0.0001) (median, 2.7 min vs. 49.0 min). Most sugammadex patients (97%) recovered to a train-of-four ratio of 0.9 within 5 min after administration. In contrast, most neostigmine patients (73%) recovered between 30 and 60 min after administration, with 23% requiring more than 60 min to recover to a train-of-four ratio of 0.9.
Recovery from profound rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade was significantly faster with sugammadex versus with neostigmine, suggesting that sugammadex has a unique ability to rapidly reverse profound rocuronium neuromuscular blockade.
传统上,使用乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂来逆转非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂的作用,但这些药物无法充分逆转深度阻滞。舒更葡糖是一种新型逆转剂,通过包裹作用来逆转罗库溴铵的效应。本研究评估了舒更葡糖与新斯的明在逆转罗库溴铵所致深度神经肌肉阻滞方面的疗效和安全性。
这项III期随机研究纳入了年龄18岁及以上、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为I-IV级的外科手术患者。患者被随机分为接受舒更葡糖(4.0mg/kg)或新斯的明(70μg/kg)加格隆溴铵(14μg/kg)治疗。麻醉患者接受插管剂量的罗库溴铵(0.6mg/kg),并根据需要给予维持剂量(0.15mg/kg)。通过加速度肌电图进行神经肌肉监测。在强直刺激后计数出现1-2次(深度神经肌肉阻滞)时给予舒更葡糖或新斯的明。主要疗效参数是从给予舒更葡糖或新斯的明-格隆溴铵到四个成串刺激比值恢复至0.9的时间。
在意向性治疗人群中(每组n = 37),舒更葡糖组四个成串刺激比值恢复至0.9的几何平均恢复时间为2.9分钟,而新斯的明-格隆溴铵组为50.4分钟(P < 0.0001)(中位数,2.7分钟对49.0分钟)。大多数接受舒更葡糖治疗的患者(97%)在给药后5分钟内四个成串刺激比值恢复至0.9。相比之下,大多数接受新斯的明治疗的患者(73%)在给药后30至60分钟恢复,23%的患者需要超过60分钟才能恢复至四个成串刺激比值0.9。
与新斯的明相比,舒更葡糖能使罗库溴铵所致深度神经肌肉阻滞的恢复显著加快,表明舒更葡糖具有快速逆转罗库溴铵深度神经肌肉阻滞的独特能力。