Kumar Prashant, Kaur Kiranpreet, Singhal Suresh Kumar, Vashishth Sumedha, Manohar Manisha, Bangarwa Nidhi
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt B D Sharma, PGIMS @ University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Jan-Apr;16(1):77-82. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_210_23. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
BACKGROUND & AIM: The study compared the efficacy of neostigmine and sugammadex in reversing rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing surgery. The research aims to understand the drugs' benefits of safe reversal and impact in the diverse Indian population due to genetic, ethnic, lifestyle, and healthcare infrastructure differences.
The prospective randomized double-blind study was conducted in 40 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. Patients in group S were given Sugammadex 2mgkg-1 [SugmadexTM by Varenyam Healthcare India] and group N were given Neostigmine 0.05mgkg-1 with glycopyrollate 0.02mgkg-1 for the reversal of rocuronium. Time to reach TOF ratio of 0.9, extubation time, Aldrete score, adverse events, and hemodynamic changes were monitored.
Both groups had comparable rocuronium doses and time to achieve 90% TOF ratio. However, sugammadex led to significantly faster extubation times (157.75 (97.33) [95% CI =61.0 - 414.50] sec) compared to neostigmine (341.50 (89.92) [95% CI =171.50 - 498.50] sec). Sugammadex was also associated with fewer adverse events and faster recovery based on the Aldrete score.
In conclusion, sugammadex proved superior to neostigmine, providing rapid reversal, shorter extubation times, and fewer side effects in rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. In post operative period patient population with facio maxilla surgery will get increased safety. These findings have implications not only for India but also for the global medical community.
本研究比较了新斯的明和舒更葡糖在接受手术患者中逆转罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞的疗效。该研究旨在了解由于遗传、种族、生活方式和医疗基础设施差异,这两种药物在安全逆转方面的益处以及对不同印度人群的影响。
本前瞻性随机双盲研究纳入了40例年龄在18 - 60岁、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为I - II级、计划在全身麻醉下行气管插管手术的患者,性别不限。S组患者给予舒更葡糖2mg/kg(印度Varenyam Healthcare公司的SugmadexTM),N组患者给予新斯的明0.05mg/kg加格隆溴铵0.02mg/kg用于逆转罗库溴铵作用。监测达到强直刺激后计数比值(TOF)为0.9的时间、拔管时间、Aldrete评分、不良事件和血流动力学变化。
两组的罗库溴铵剂量和达到90% TOF比值的时间相当。然而,与新斯的明(341.50(89.92)[95%可信区间=171.50 - 498.50]秒)相比,舒更葡糖导致拔管时间显著更快(157.75(97.33)[95%可信区间=61.0 - 414.50]秒)。基于Aldrete评分,舒更葡糖还与较少的不良事件和更快的恢复相关。
总之,舒更葡糖在逆转罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞方面被证明优于新斯的明,具有快速逆转、更短的拔管时间和更少的副作用。在接受颌面外科手术的术后患者群体中,安全性会提高。这些发现不仅对印度有意义,对全球医学界也有意义。