Suppr超能文献

失败分析:正畸托槽脱粘后的釉质骨折

Failure analysis: enamel fracture after debonding orthodontic brackets.

作者信息

Chen Chen-Sheng, Hsu Ming-Lun, Chang Kin-Di, Kuang Shou-Hsin, Chen Ping-Ting, Gung Yih-Wen

机构信息

School of Dentistry, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2008 Nov;78(6):1071-7. doi: 10.2319/091907-449.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the location and size of enamel fracture (EF) when debonding a bracket.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tests on actual EF situations were conducted in different debonding load modes (tension, shear, and torsion) via mechanical testing, finite element model (FEM) analysis, and scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). Through these simultaneous analyses of the relationships among debonding load modes, value/distribution of stress, and actual enamel fracture location/size, an investigation was undertaken to explore the complex failure mode during enamel fracture after debonding of an orthodontic bracket.

RESULTS

The EF usually was located in the area where the force was exerted during various loading modes. The tensile, shear, and torsion debonding modes produce EF sizes and incidences with no significant differences. Findings on FEM matched the mechanical testing and SEM results.

CONCLUSIONS

The EF locations coincided with the areas where the tensile, shear, or torsion force was exerted. Therefore, the dentist should give extra care and attention to these specific areas of enamel after debonding. The sizes and incidences of EF produced by these three debonding modes showed no significant difference. Thus, clinically, when the sizes and incidences of produced EF are considered, it should not matter which of these three exerting forces is used to debond a bracket.

摘要

目的

确定去除托槽时釉质骨折(EF)的位置和大小。

材料与方法

通过机械测试、有限元模型(FEM)分析和扫描电子显微镜(SEM),在不同的去除负荷模式(拉伸、剪切和扭转)下对实际的EF情况进行测试。通过对去除负荷模式、应力值/分布以及实际釉质骨折位置/大小之间关系的这些同步分析,对正畸托槽去除后釉质骨折期间的复杂失效模式进行了研究。

结果

EF通常位于各种加载模式下施力的区域。拉伸、剪切和扭转去除模式产生的EF大小和发生率无显著差异。有限元模型的结果与机械测试和扫描电子显微镜结果相符。

结论

EF的位置与施加拉伸、剪切或扭转力的区域一致。因此,牙医在去除托槽后应格外小心并关注这些釉质的特定区域。这三种去除模式产生的EF大小和发生率无显著差异。因此,在临床上,当考虑产生的EF的大小和发生率时,使用这三种施力方式中的哪一种来去除托槽并不重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验