Antao Brice, Lansdale Nick, Roberts Julian, Mackinnon Ewen
Paediatric Surgical Unit, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TH, UK.
J Pediatr Urol. 2007 Apr;3(2):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
Despite ongoing refinement of numerous techniques, the incidence of complications following hypospadias repair is still significant. The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors that affect the success in childhood of foreskin reconstruction with hypospadias repair.
A retrospective study was carried out of all primary hypospadias repairs with foreskin reconstruction (n=408) over the last 23 years. The hypospadias was coronal in 160 (39%), glanular in 114 (28%), subcoronal in 78 (19%) and distal penile in 56 (14%) cases. Foreskin reconstruction was included in 362 cases suitable for a meatal advancement (191) or distal urethral tubularization (171), and 46 cases for a flip-flap procedure (37 Mathieu, nine Barcat). Outcome analysis was of foreskin-related complications post surgery.
Foreskin repair was successful in 333 cases (92%) that underwent meatal advancement/distal urethral tubularization, and 33 (72%) that underwent a flip-flap operation. Complications related to the foreskin occurred in 10% of the whole group with a urethral fistula rate of 8%. The median age at surgery was 13 months (2-120 months), and the median follow-up period was 11 months (1-100 months).
A good cosmetic and functional outcome can be achieved with foreskin reconstruction combined with a variety of hypospadias repairs. The outcome in this series was better in cases of distal hypospadias using interrupted polyglactin sutures.
