• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远端尿道下裂的包皮重建术与包皮环切术对比

Foreskin reconstruction vs circumcision in distal hypospadias.

作者信息

Rampersad Rajay, Nyo Yoke Lin, Hutson John, O'Brien Mike, Heloury Yves

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Urology, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.

Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Oct;33(10):1131-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00383-017-4151-y. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00383-017-4151-y
PMID:28856414
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to determine if there were differences in the complication rates between foreskin reconstruction (FR) and circumcision (CIRC) in distal hypospadias repairs. The primary outcomes were urethrocutaneous fistula (UF) and dehiscence.

METHODS

The data of distal hypospadias operated between 2005 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were any distal hypospadias repair that required an urethroplasty. The exclusion criteria were follow-up <1 year, redo procedures, chordee greater than 20°, and incomplete data. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed on the results.

RESULTS

213 patients were included (95 FR and 118 CIRC). The 2 groups were comparable for age at surgery 19.32 months in FR and 14.25 months in CIRC. Mathieu repair was more common in FR (47/95-49.47%) than in CIRC (45/118-38.14%). The total subsequent procedures required were 23 in FR and 57 in CIRC. The incidence of UF was 6.3% (6/95) in FR and 27.1% (32/118) in CIRC (p < 0.001, OR 5.52, 95% CI 2.2-13.9). Complete dehiscence rates were 3.16% (3/95) FR vs 11.02% (13/118) for CIRC (p = 0.037, OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.05-13.74). The incidence of patients requiring reoperation was 18.9% (18/95) in FR versus 45.8% (54/118) in CIRC (p < 0.001, OR 3.61, 95% CI 1.93-6.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Foreskin Reconstruction conferred a significantly lower rate of complications, particularly the UF rate, dehiscence rate, and number of patients that required reoperation. Our rate of complications in the CIRC group is much higher than other published data.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定远端尿道下裂修复术中包皮重建术(FR)与包皮环切术(CIRC)之间的并发症发生率是否存在差异。主要结局指标为尿道皮肤瘘(UF)和裂开。

方法

回顾性分析2005年至2013年间接受手术治疗的远端尿道下裂患者的数据。纳入标准为任何需要进行尿道成形术的远端尿道下裂修复术。排除标准为随访时间<1年、再次手术、阴茎下弯大于20°以及数据不完整。对结果进行单因素和多因素分析。

结果

共纳入213例患者(95例行FR,118例行CIRC)。两组患者手术时的年龄具有可比性,FR组为19.32个月,CIRC组为14.25个月。Mathieu修复术在FR组(47/95 - 49.47%)比在CIRC组(45/118 - 38.14%)更为常见。FR组总共需要进行23次后续手术,CIRC组为57次。FR组UF的发生率为6.3%(6/95),CIRC组为27.1%(32/118)(p < 0.001,OR 5.52,95% CI 2.2 - 13.9)。FR组完全裂开率为3.16%(3/95),CIRC组为11.02%(13/118)(p = 0.037,OR 3.8,95% CI 1.05 - 13.74)。FR组需要再次手术的患者发生率为18.9%(18/95),CIRC组为45.8%(54/118)(p < 0.001,OR 3.61,95% CI 1.93 - 6.76)。

结论

包皮重建术的并发症发生率显著较低,尤其是UF发生率、裂开率以及需要再次手术的患者数量。我们CIRC组的并发症发生率远高于其他已发表的数据。

相似文献

1
Foreskin reconstruction vs circumcision in distal hypospadias.远端尿道下裂的包皮重建术与包皮环切术对比
Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Oct;33(10):1131-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00383-017-4151-y. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
2
Are there anatomical limiting factors to foreskin reconstruction at the time of single-stage hypospadias repair?在一期尿道下裂修复术中,包皮重建是否存在解剖学上的限制因素?
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Dec;19(6):700.e1-700.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
3
Preputioplasty associated with urethroplasty for correction of distal hypospadias: a prospective study and proposition of a new objective scoring system for evaluation of esthetic and functional outcome.包皮成形术联合尿道成形术矫正远端尿道下裂:一项前瞻性研究及一种评估美学和功能结局的新客观评分系统的提议。
J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Apr;10(2):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
4
Foreskin reconstruction at the time of single-stage hypospadias repair: is it a safe procedure?一期尿道下裂修复术同期行包皮重建术:这是一种安全的手术吗?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Feb;51(2):187-191. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-2043-2. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
5
Long-term outcomes of foreskin reconstruction in distal hypospadias; a cohort study spanning twenty years.远端型尿道下裂行包皮重建术的长期疗效:一项跨越二十年的队列研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Jun;20(3):410-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.11.047. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
6
A prospective study comparing modified foreskin reconstruction versus circumcision with tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal and mid penile hypospadias.一项前瞻性研究,比较改良包皮重建术与包皮环切术联合管状切开板尿道成形术治疗阴茎远端和中段尿道下裂的效果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):674.e1-674.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.040. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
Prepuce preserving versus conventional Mathieu urethroplasty for distal hypospadias - a prospective randomized study.保留包皮与传统 Mathieu 尿道成形术治疗远端尿道下裂的前瞻性随机研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2012 Jun;8(3):264-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
8
Foreskin reconstruction and preservation of a thin distal urethra: a challenge in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty.包皮重建与保留薄的远端尿道:管状切开板尿道成形术中的一项挑战。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2011 Jul;27(7):755-60. doi: 10.1007/s00383-011-2891-7. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
9
Our experience of proximal hypospadias repair using the Cloutier-Bracka technique at the Gynaeco-Obstetric and Paediatric Hospital, Yaounde-Cameroon.我们在喀麦隆雅温得妇产科和儿科医院使用Cloutier-Bracka技术修复近端尿道下裂的经验。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2016 Oct-Dec;13(4):193-195. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.194673.
10
Distal hypospadias repair with or without foreskin reconstruction: A single-surgeon experience.远端尿道下裂修复术(伴或不伴包皮重建):单术者经验
J Pediatr Urol. 2008 Oct;4(5):377-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.01.215. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Long segment ureteral reconstruction using the prepuce: A case report.利用包皮进行长段输尿管重建:一例报告。
Urol Case Rep. 2024 Dec 19;58:102912. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2024.102912. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Complications Following Primary Repair of Non-proximal Hypospadias in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童非近端尿道下裂一期修复术后的并发症:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Pediatr. 2020 Dec 9;8:579364. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.579364. eCollection 2020.
3
Foreskin reconstruction at the time of single-stage hypospadias repair: is it a safe procedure?

本文引用的文献

1
Circumcision: Is it worth it for 21st-century Australian boys?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Jun;51(6):580-3. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12825. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
2
Preputioplasty associated with urethroplasty for correction of distal hypospadias: a prospective study and proposition of a new objective scoring system for evaluation of esthetic and functional outcome.包皮成形术联合尿道成形术矫正远端尿道下裂:一项前瞻性研究及一种评估美学和功能结局的新客观评分系统的提议。
J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Apr;10(2):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the perimeatal-based flap and tubularized incised-plate techniques for primary hypospadias repair.比较基于尿道口皮瓣和管状切开板技术进行一期尿道下裂修复的研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
一期尿道下裂修复术同期行包皮重建术:这是一种安全的手术吗?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Feb;51(2):187-191. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-2043-2. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2013 Aug;29(8):811-21. doi: 10.1007/s00383-013-3335-3. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
4
Introducing the HOPE (Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation)-score: a validation study of an objective scoring system for evaluating cosmetic appearance in hypospadias patients.介绍 HOPE(尿道下裂阴茎客观评估)评分:一种评估尿道下裂患者外观美观的客观评分系统的验证研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Dec;9(6 Pt B):1006-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
5
Foreskin reconstruction does not increase urethroplasty or skin complications after distal TIP hypospadias repair.包皮重建不会增加远端 TIP 尿道下裂修复术后的尿道成形术或皮肤并发症。
J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Aug;9(4):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
6
Prepuce preserving versus conventional Mathieu urethroplasty for distal hypospadias - a prospective randomized study.保留包皮与传统 Mathieu 尿道成形术治疗远端尿道下裂的前瞻性随机研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2012 Jun;8(3):264-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
7
Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair for distal hypospadias.管状切开板尿道下裂修复术治疗尿道下裂。
J Pediatr Urol. 2010 Aug;6(4):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.09.010.
8
A lower fistula rate in hypospadias surgery.
J Pediatr Urol. 2007 Oct;3(5):395-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.12.003. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
9
Factors affecting the outcome of foreskin reconstruction in hypospadias surgery.
J Pediatr Urol. 2007 Apr;3(2):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
10
Distal hypospadias repair with or without foreskin reconstruction: A single-surgeon experience.远端尿道下裂修复术(伴或不伴包皮重建):单术者经验
J Pediatr Urol. 2008 Oct;4(5):377-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.01.215. Epub 2008 Apr 18.