Suppr超能文献

对营养学实习项目中学生选拔实践与信念的评估。

Assessment of student selection practices and beliefs in dietetic internship programs.

作者信息

McCabe B J, Koury S D

机构信息

Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, College of Health Related Professions, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1990 Jan;90(1):119-23.

PMID:2295755
Abstract

With declining college enrollment, the health professions, including dietetics, are recognizing a need to assess and monitor student selection more closely. In this survey of 102 dietetic internship programs, program directors and a sample of their faculty members were asked to describe their current selection practices and to identify the beliefs they hold about the information obtained from various components of their procedures. Differences in beliefs between program directors and other faculty members were compared by t-test analysis. The five major categories of internship selection procedures are presented with information items faculty members believe are derived from each category, and the results are compared with those of previous surveys of dietetic selection practices. Major findings are that the intern selection process has changed significantly since 1978, with greater emphasis on work experience and extracurricular activities; the number of applicants per position has doubled despite a doubling of dietetic internship programs; and program directors and faculty members agree on the major selection practices but not on the information obtained from a given category. In the discussion, the findings are evaluated against a broad background of health profession education literature; implications are raised for intern selection committees and for the applicant.

摘要

随着大学入学人数的下降,包括营养学在内的健康专业领域开始意识到需要更密切地评估和监测学生选拔情况。在这项针对102个营养实习项目的调查中,项目主任及其部分教员被要求描述他们当前的选拔做法,并确定他们对从选拔程序各部分获得的信息的看法。通过t检验分析比较了项目主任和其他教员看法上的差异。文中呈现了实习选拔程序的五大主要类别以及教员认为源自每个类别的信息项目,并将结果与之前关于营养学选拔做法的调查结果进行了比较。主要发现如下:自1978年以来,实习生选拔过程发生了显著变化,更加注重工作经验和课外活动;尽管营养实习项目数量增加了一倍,但每个职位的申请者数量也翻了一番;项目主任和教员在主要选拔做法上达成一致,但在从某一类别获得的信息方面存在分歧。在讨论中,根据健康专业教育文献的广泛背景对研究结果进行了评估;对实习生选拔委员会和申请者提出了相关启示。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验