• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of enalapril and slow-release verapamil in essential hypertension: a double-blind, cross-over study.

作者信息

Fagher B, Katzman P, Hulthén U L, Henningsen N C, Thulin T

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Lund University Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

J Intern Med. 1991 Sep;230(3):219-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1991.tb00434.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2796.1991.tb00434.x
PMID:1895044
Abstract

The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of enalapril (E) and slow-release verapamil (V) were compared in a 2-month double-blind cross-over study in 22 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After 1 month, significantly lower systolic (P less than 0.01) and diastolic (P less than 0.02) blood pressures (BP) were achieved with E, 20 mg d-1, compared with V, 240 mg d-1. After 2 months of treatment, BP reductions were similar after E, 40 mg d-1, and V, 240 mg twice a day. The fall in supine mean BP after 2 months of treatment with V was significantly greater in patients aged greater than or equal to 50 years of age (P = 0.02) (median 18 mmHg) than in patients aged less than 50 years (10 mmHg). E showed similar effectiveness in both age groups. Statistical group analysis of a quality-of-life questionnaire showed no significant differences between the active drugs and the placebo. It is concluded that E and V are equally effective as antihypertensive agents, and that both drugs are well tolerated.

摘要

相似文献

1
Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of enalapril and slow-release verapamil in essential hypertension: a double-blind, cross-over study.
J Intern Med. 1991 Sep;230(3):219-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1991.tb00434.x.
2
Antihypertensive and renal effects of enalapril and slow-release verapamil in essential hypertension. A double-blind, randomized study.依那普利和缓释维拉帕米治疗原发性高血压的降压及肾脏效应:一项双盲随机研究
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;39 Suppl 1:S41-3. doi: 10.1007/BF01409207.
3
Efficacy and tolerability of enalapril and sustained-release verapamil in older patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.依那普利与缓释维拉帕米治疗老年轻至中度原发性高血压的疗效及耐受性
Clin Ther. 1990 Mar-Apr;12(2):139-48.
4
Preventing increases in early-morning blood pressure, heart rate, and the rate-pressure product with controlled onset extended release verapamil at bedtime versus enalapril, losartan, and placebo on arising.睡前服用控释维拉帕米与依那普利、氯沙坦及安慰剂相比,预防清晨血压、心率及率压乘积升高的效果。
Am Heart J. 2002 Oct;144(4):657-65. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.124866.
5
A comparative trial of controlled-onset, extended-release verapamil, enalapril, and losartan on blood pressure and heart rate changes.控释维拉帕米、依那普利和氯沙坦对血压和心率变化影响的比较试验。
Am J Hypertens. 2002 Jan;15(1 Pt 1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(01)02254-3.
6
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril and sustained-release verapamil in older patients with hypertension.
Clin Ther. 1991 May-Jun;13(3):401-8.
7
Lipid profile during antihypertensive treatment. The SLIP Study Group. Study on Lipids with Isoptin Press.抗高血压治疗期间的血脂情况。SLIP研究小组。异搏定降压血脂研究。
Drugs. 1993;46 Suppl 2:16-23. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199300462-00005.
8
Efficacy and safety of a new long-acting drug combination, trandolapril/verapamil as compared to monotherapy in primary hypertension. Swedish TARKA trialists.新型长效药物组合群多普利/维拉帕米与单一疗法治疗原发性高血压的疗效及安全性比较。瑞典TARKA试验研究者。
Blood Press. 2000;9(2-3):140-5. doi: 10.1080/080370500453483.
9
Comparison of candesartan versus enalapril in essential hypertension. Italian Candesartan Study Group.坎地沙坦与依那普利治疗原发性高血压的比较。意大利坎地沙坦研究组。
Am J Hypertens. 2001 Feb;14(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(00)01240-1.
10
Enalapril and verapamil in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly.依那普利与维拉帕米治疗老年单纯收缩期高血压
Clin Ther. 1992 Nov-Dec;14(6):835-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-related quality-of-life measurement in hypertension. A review of randomised controlled drug trials.高血压患者健康相关生活质量的测量:随机对照药物试验综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Nov;18(5):435-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018050-00003.
2
Enalapril: a review of quality-of-life and pharmacoeconomic aspects of its use in heart failure and mild to moderate hypertension.依那普利:关于其用于心力衰竭及轻至中度高血压的生活质量和药物经济学方面的综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Aug;6(2):155-82. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406020-00008.
3
A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of moderate/severe hypertension.
氨氯地平与依那普利治疗中/重度高血压的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 May;35(5):491-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04175.x.