• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仅仅因为你能够做到,并不意味着你就应该这么做:呼吁合理应用住院医师共同管理。

Just because you can, doesn't mean that you should: A call for the rational application of hospitalist comanagement.

作者信息

Siegal Eric M

机构信息

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2008 Sep;3(5):398-402. doi: 10.1002/jhm.361.

DOI:10.1002/jhm.361
PMID:18951402
Abstract

Medical comanagement has become a mainstay of hospital medicine. Several studies, however, suggest that medical consultation and comanagement may not be as effective as originally anticipated. The expansion of comanagement services has helped fuel massive demand for hospitalists and with it a critical and potentially destabilizing hospitalist manpower shortage. Comanagement may also drive unanticipated consequences such as facilitating surgeon and specialist disengagement and hospitalist career dissatisfaction and burnout. Comanagement services should be developed carefully and methodically, paying close attention to consequences, intended and unintended.

摘要

医疗共同管理已成为医院医学的支柱。然而,多项研究表明,医疗会诊和共同管理可能并不像最初预期的那样有效。共同管理服务的扩展助长了对住院医师的大量需求,随之而来的是严重且可能破坏稳定的住院医师人力短缺。共同管理还可能引发意想不到的后果,比如促使外科医生和专科医生脱离工作,以及住院医师职业满意度下降和职业倦怠。应谨慎、有条不紊地发展共同管理服务,密切关注有意和无意产生的后果。

相似文献

1
Just because you can, doesn't mean that you should: A call for the rational application of hospitalist comanagement.仅仅因为你能够做到,并不意味着你就应该这么做:呼吁合理应用住院医师共同管理。
J Hosp Med. 2008 Sep;3(5):398-402. doi: 10.1002/jhm.361.
2
Surgical comanagement: a natural evolution of hospitalist practice.外科共同管理:住院医师实践的自然演变。
J Hosp Med. 2008 Sep;3(5):394-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.359.
3
The effect of a hospitalist comanagement service on vascular surgery inpatients.住院医师共同管理服务对血管外科住院患者的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1550-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
4
Comanagement hospitalist services for neurosurgery.神经外科的共同管理住院医师服务。
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015 Apr;26(2):295-300, x-xi. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
5
Pediatric hospitalist comanagement of surgical patients: challenges and opportunities.小儿外科住院医师对手术患者的联合管理:挑战与机遇
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2008 Mar;47(2):114-21. doi: 10.1177/0009922807306789. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
6
Provider expectations and experiences of comanagement.医疗服务提供者共同管理的期望和体验。
J Hosp Med. 2011 Sep;6(7):401-4. doi: 10.1002/jhm.914.
7
Vascular surgeon-hospitalist comanagement improves in-hospital mortality at the expense of increased in-hospital cost.血管外科医生与住院医师共同管理虽以增加住院费用为代价,但能降低住院死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.042. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
8
The University of Michigan Specialist-Hospitalist Allied Research Program: jumpstarting hospital medicine research.密歇根大学专科医生 - 医院医生联合研究项目:启动医院医学研究。
J Hosp Med. 2008 Jul;3(4):308-13. doi: 10.1002/jhm.342.
9
Pediatric hospitalist comanagement of spinal fusion surgery patients.小儿住院医师对脊柱融合手术患者的共同管理。
J Hosp Med. 2007 Jan;2(1):23-30. doi: 10.1002/jhm.144.
10
Hospitalist-vascular surgery comanagement: effects on complications and mortality.住院医师与血管外科共同管理:对并发症和死亡率的影响。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2016 Dec;44(5):233-236. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2016.1259543. Epub 2016 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Resident shortages and their impact on surgical care, defensive medicine, and patient management: a retrospective study in South Korea.住院医师短缺及其对外科护理、防御性医疗和患者管理的影响:韩国的一项回顾性研究。
Korean J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr;21(1):32-39. doi: 10.14216/kjco.25331. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Internal medicine consultation for high-risk surgical patients: reflection on hospital mortality and readmission rates in a low-income country.高危手术患者的内科会诊:对低收入国家医院死亡率和再入院率的反思。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Oct 27;69(11):e20230468. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230468. eCollection 2023.
3
Effect of Active Surgical Co-Management by Medical Hospitalists in Urology Inpatient Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
泌尿科住院患者中医疗医院医师主动手术协作管理的效果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2023 Sep;64(9):558-565. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0143.
4
Medical and surgical co-management: is time ripe?医学与外科联合管理:时机成熟了吗?
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;17(3):935-936. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02726-8. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
5
Surgical Comanagement for Hip Fracture: Time for a Randomized Trial.髋部骨折的手术联合治疗:开展随机试验的时候了。
J Hosp Med. 2020 Aug;15(8):510-511. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3415.
6
Evaluation of Internal Medicine Physician or Multidisciplinary Team Comanagement of Surgical Patients and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.内科学医师或多学科团队共同管理手术患者与临床结局的评估:系统评价与荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e204088. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4088.
7
Pediatric hospital medicine role in the comanagement of the hospitalized surgical patient.儿科医院医学在住院手术患者共同管理中的作用。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014 Aug;61(4):653-61. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 May 20.
8
How best to design surgical comanagement services for pediatric surgical patients?如何为小儿外科患者设计最佳的手术联合管理服务?
Hosp Pediatr. 2013 Jul;3(3):242-3. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2013-0033.
9
The Perioperative Surgical Home: how can it make the case so everyone wins?围手术期手术之家:如何让每个人都赢?
BMC Anesthesiol. 2013 Mar 14;13:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-6.
10
The impact of a hospitalist on role boundaries in an orthopedic environment.在骨科环境中,医院医师对角色边界的影响。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:249-56. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S36316. Epub 2012 Oct 5.