Surgical Comanagement for Hip Fracture: Time for a Randomized Trial.
作者信息
Vincent Corita, Cram Peter
机构信息
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
出版信息
J Hosp Med. 2020 Aug;15(8):510-511. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3415.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Surgical Comanagement for Hip Fracture: Time for a Randomized Trial.髋部骨折的手术联合治疗：开展随机试验的时候了。
J Hosp Med. 2020 Aug;15(8):510-511. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3415.
2
Medical Comanagement of Hip Fracture Patients Is Not Associated with Superior Perioperative Outcomes: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.髋关节骨折患者的医疗共管与围手术期结局的改善不相关：国家手术质量改进计划的倾向评分匹配回顾性队列分析。
J Hosp Med. 2020 Aug;15(8):468-474. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3343.
3
Comanagement of Hip Fracture Patients.髋部骨折患者的共同管理
J Hosp Med. 2020 Aug;15(8):512. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3385.
4
Do Mortality and Complication Rates Differ Between Periprosthetic and Native Hip Fractures?假体周围与原发性髋关节骨折的死亡率和并发症发生率是否存在差异？
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1914-1918. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.046. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Dedicated Perioperative Hip Fracture Comanagement Programs are Cost-effective in High-volume Centers: An Economic Analysis.在高流量中心，专门的围手术期髋部骨折联合管理项目具有成本效益：一项经济分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):222-33. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4494-4. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
6
The Case for Comanagement and Care Pathways for Osteoporotic Patients with a Hip Fracture.髋部骨折骨质疏松患者的共同管理及护理路径案例
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Aug 1;100(15):1343-1350. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01288.
7
Using a Comanagement Model to Develop a Hip Fracture Integrated Care Pathway.采用共同管理模式制定髋部骨折综合护理路径。
J Healthc Manag. 2017 Mar/Apr;62(2):107-117. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-17-00011.
8
Delay in Hip Fracture Surgery Prolongs Postoperative Hospital Length of Stay but Does Not Adversely Affect Outcomes at 30 Days.髋关节骨折手术后的延迟会延长术后住院时间，但不会对 30 天的预后产生不利影响。
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Dec;32(12):629-633. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001306.
9
Cephalomedullary nailing versus sliding hip screws for Intertrochanteric and basicervical hip fractures: a propensity-matched study of short-term outcomes in over 17,000 patients.髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间及股骨颈基底骨折：一项对17000多名患者短期疗效的倾向匹配研究
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Feb;30(2):243-250. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02543-y. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
Discharge destination following hip fracture: comparative effectiveness and cost analyses.髋部骨折后的出院目的地：比较效果与成本分析
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Sep 30;12(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0382-8.
引用本文的文献
1
Comanagement of surgical patients between neurosurgeons and internal-medicine clinicians: observational cohort study.神经外科医生与内科临床医生对手术患者的共同管理：观察性队列研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;20(3):751-760. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03866-x. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
本文引用的文献
1
Medical Comanagement of Hip Fracture Patients Is Not Associated with Superior Perioperative Outcomes: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.髋关节骨折患者的医疗共管与围手术期结局的改善不相关：国家手术质量改进计划的倾向评分匹配回顾性队列分析。
J Hosp Med. 2020 Aug;15(8):468-474. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3343.
2
Impact of an Integrated Hip Fracture Inpatient Program on Length of Stay and Costs.综合髋部骨折住院治疗方案对住院时间和费用的影响。
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Dec;30(12):647-652. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000691.
3
An Orthopedic-Hospitalist Comanaged Hip Fracture Service Reduces Inpatient Length of Stay.骨科-住院医师共同管理的髋部骨折治疗服务可缩短住院时间。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2016 Dec;7(4):171-177. doi: 10.1177/2151458516661383. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Zero to 50,000 - The 20th Anniversary of the Hospitalist.从零到五万——住院医师制度诞生20周年
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 15;375(11):1009-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607958. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
5
Dedicated Perioperative Hip Fracture Comanagement Programs are Cost-effective in High-volume Centers: An Economic Analysis.在高流量中心，专门的围手术期髋部骨折联合管理项目具有成本效益：一项经济分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):222-33. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4494-4. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
6
Orthogeriatric care models and outcomes in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.髋部骨折患者的骨科老年病护理模式和结局：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Mar;28(3):e49-55. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182a5a045.
7
Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus.优化 ACS NSQIP 模型以评估手术质量和风险：患者风险调整、手术操作组合调整、收缩调整和手术重点。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Aug;217(2):336-46.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.027. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
8
Job characteristics, satisfaction, and burnout across hospitalist practice models.医院医生实践模式下的工作特征、满意度和倦怠情况。
J Hosp Med. 2012 May-Jun;7(5):402-10. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1907. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
9
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.倾向得分法在观察性研究中减少混杂效应的介绍
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
10
Geriatric intervention in elderly patients with hip fracture in an orthopedic ward.骨科病房对老年髋部骨折患者的老年病干预措施。
J Inj Violence Res. 2012 Jul;4(2):45-51. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v4i2.96. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
Zotero 插件