Ascierto Paolo A, Kirkwood John M
Unit of Medical Oncology and Innovative Therapy, Melanoma Cooperative Group, National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy.
J Transl Med. 2008 Oct 27;6:62. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-6-62.
The effect of interferon alpha (IFNalpha2) given alone or in combination has been widely explored in clinical trials over the past 30 years. Despite the number of adjuvant studies that have been conducted, controversy remains in the oncology community regarding the role of this treatment. Recently an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis at longer follow-up was reported, showing a statistically significant benefit for IFN in relation to relapse-free survival, without any difference according to dosage (p = 0.2) or duration of IFN therapy (p = 0.5). Most interestingly, there was a statistically significant benefit of IFN upon overall survival (OS) that translates into an absolute benefit of at least 3% (CI 1-5%) at 5 years. Thus, both the individual trials and this meta-analysis provide evidence that adjuvant IFNalpha2 significantly reduces the risk of relapse and mortality of high-risk melanoma, albeit with a relatively small absolute improvement in survival in the overall population. We have surveyed the international literature from the meta-analysis (2006) to summarize and assimilate current biological evidence that indicates a potent impact of this molecule upon the tumor microenvironment and STAT signaling, as well as the immunological polarization of the tumor tissue in vivo. In conclusion, we argue that there is a compelling rationale for new research upon IFN, especially in the adjuvant setting where the most pronounced effects of this agent have been discovered. These efforts have already shed light upon the immunological and proinflammatory predictors of therapeutic benefit from this agent--that may allow practitioners to determine which patients may benefit from IFN therapy, and approaches that may enable us to overcome resistance or enhance the efficacy of IFN. Future efforts may well build toward patient-oriented therapy based upon the knowledge of the unique molecular features of this disease and the immune system of each melanoma patient.
在过去30年的临床试验中,已广泛探索了单独使用或联合使用α干扰素(IFNα2)的效果。尽管已经进行了大量辅助治疗研究,但肿瘤学界对于这种治疗方法的作用仍存在争议。最近有报道称,一项针对更长随访期的个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析显示,IFN在无复发生存方面具有统计学意义上的显著益处,且根据剂量(p = 0.2)或IFN治疗持续时间(p = 0.5)无差异。最有趣的是,IFN对总生存期(OS)有统计学意义上的显著益处,这意味着在5年时绝对益处至少为3%(置信区间1 - 5%)。因此,无论是个体试验还是这项荟萃分析都提供了证据,表明辅助性IFNα2可显著降低高危黑色素瘤的复发风险和死亡率,尽管总体人群的生存绝对改善相对较小。我们检索了荟萃分析(2006年)以来的国际文献,以总结和吸收当前的生物学证据,这些证据表明该分子对肿瘤微环境和STAT信号传导以及体内肿瘤组织的免疫极化有强大影响。总之,我们认为有令人信服的理由对IFN进行新的研究,特别是在已发现该药物最显著效果的辅助治疗环境中。这些努力已经揭示了该药物治疗益处的免疫和促炎预测因素,这可能使从业者能够确定哪些患者可能从IFN治疗中获益,以及哪些方法可能使我们能够克服耐药性或提高IFN的疗效。未来的努力很可能基于对这种疾病独特分子特征和每个黑色素瘤患者免疫系统的了解,朝着以患者为导向的治疗方向发展。