• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个被破坏的钙黏着蛋白基因的渐渗,使易感的棉铃虫获得对苏云金芽孢杆菌毒素Cry1Ac的抗性。

Introgression of a disrupted cadherin gene enables susceptible Helicoverpa armigera to obtain resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac.

作者信息

Yang Y-H, Yang Y-J, Gao W-Y, Guo J-J, Wu Y-H, Wu Y-D

机构信息

Key Lab of Monitoring and Management of Plant Diseases and Insects, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Bull Entomol Res. 2009 Apr;99(2):175-81. doi: 10.1017/S0007485308006226. Epub 2008 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1017/S0007485308006226
PMID:18954492
Abstract

A disrupted allele (r1) of a cadherin gene (Ha_BtR) is genetically associated with incompletely recessive resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac in a Cry1Ac-selected strain (GYBT) of Helicoverpa armigera. The r1 allele of Ha_BtR was introgressed into a susceptible SCD strain by crossing the GYBT strain to the SCD strain, followed by repeated backcrossing to the SCD strain and molecular marker assisted family selection. The introgressed strain (designated as SCD-r1, carrying homozygous r1 allele) obtained 438-fold resistance to Cry1Ac, >41-fold resistance to Cry1Aa and 31-fold resistance Cry1Ab compared with the SCD strain; however, there was no significant difference in susceptibility to Cry2Aa between the integrated and parent strains. It confirms that the loss of function mutation of Ha_BtR alone can confer medium to high levels of resistance to the three Cry1A toxins in H. armigera. Reciprocal crosses between the SCD and SCD-r1 strains showed that resistance to Cry1Ac in the SCD-r1 strain was completely recessive. Life tables of the SCD and SCD-r1 strains on artificial diet in the laboratory were constructed, and results showed that the net replacement rate (R0) did not differ between the strains. The toxicity of two chemical insecticides, fenvalerate and monocrotophos, against the SCD-r1 strain was not significantly different from that to the SCD strain. However, larval development time of the SCD-r1 strain was significantly longer than that of the SCD strain, indicating a fitness cost of slower larval growth is associated with Ha_BtR disruption in H. armigera.

摘要

钙黏蛋白基因(Ha_BtR)的一个 disrupted 等位基因(r1)在棉铃虫的 Cry1Ac 选择品系(GYBT)中与对苏云金芽孢杆菌毒素 Cry1Ac 的不完全隐性抗性存在遗传关联。通过将 GYBT 品系与 SCD 品系杂交,随后反复回交至 SCD 品系并进行分子标记辅助家系选择,将 Ha_BtR 的 r1 等位基因导入到敏感的 SCD 品系中。导入品系(命名为 SCD-r1,携带纯合 r1 等位基因)对 Cry1Ac 的抗性比 SCD 品系高 438 倍,对 Cry1Aa 的抗性高 41 倍以上,对 Cry1Ab 的抗性高 31 倍;然而,导入品系与亲本品系对 Cry2Aa 的敏感性没有显著差异。这证实了 Ha_BtR 的功能缺失突变单独就能赋予棉铃虫对三种 Cry1A 毒素中到高水平的抗性。SCD 品系和 SCD-r1 品系之间的正反交表明,SCD-r1 品系对 Cry1Ac 的抗性是完全隐性的。构建了 SCD 品系和 SCD-r1 品系在实验室人工饲料上的生命表,结果表明品系间的净增殖率(R0)没有差异。两种化学杀虫剂氰戊菊酯和久效磷对 SCD-r1 品系的毒性与对 SCD 品系的毒性没有显著差异。然而,SCD-r1 品系的幼虫发育时间明显长于 SCD 品系,这表明棉铃虫中 Ha_BtR 破坏与幼虫生长缓慢的适合度代价相关。

相似文献

1
Introgression of a disrupted cadherin gene enables susceptible Helicoverpa armigera to obtain resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac.一个被破坏的钙黏着蛋白基因的渐渗,使易感的棉铃虫获得对苏云金芽孢杆菌毒素Cry1Ac的抗性。
Bull Entomol Res. 2009 Apr;99(2):175-81. doi: 10.1017/S0007485308006226. Epub 2008 Oct 28.
2
Diverse cadherin mutations conferring resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac in Helicoverpa armigera.在棉铃虫中,不同的钙粘蛋白突变赋予了对苏云金芽孢杆菌 Cry1Ac 毒素的抗性。
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2010 Feb;40(2):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
3
Disruption of Ha_BtR alters binding of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin Cry1Ac to midgut BBMVs of Helicoverpa armigera.Ha_BtR的破坏改变了苏云金芽孢杆菌δ-内毒素Cry1Ac与棉铃虫中肠刷状缘膜囊泡的结合。
J Invertebr Pathol. 2008 Jan;97(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2007.04.009. Epub 2007 Jul 4.
4
Disruption of a cadherin gene associated with resistance to Cry1Ac {delta}-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in Helicoverpa armigera.棉铃虫中与对苏云金芽孢杆菌Cry1Ac δ-内毒素抗性相关的一种钙黏蛋白基因的破坏。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Feb;71(2):948-54. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.2.948-954.2005.
5
Mutated cadherin alleles from a field population of Helicoverpa armigera confer resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac.来自棉铃虫田间种群的突变钙黏蛋白等位基因赋予对苏云金芽孢杆菌毒素Cry1Ac的抗性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Nov;73(21):6939-44. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01703-07. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
6
Enhancing Cry1Ac toxicity by expression of the Helicoverpa armigera cadherin fragment in Bacillus thuringiensis.在苏云金芽孢杆菌中表达棉铃虫钙粘蛋白片段增强 Cry1Ac 毒性。
Res Microbiol. 2010 Jun;161(5):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 15.
7
Identification and molecular detection of a deletion mutation responsible for a truncated cadherin of Helicoverpa armigera.棉铃虫截短型钙黏蛋白缺失突变的鉴定与分子检测
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2006 Sep;36(9):735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Jun 16.
8
Reduction of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxicity against Helicoverpa armigera by a soluble toxin-binding cadherin fragment.一种可溶性毒素结合钙黏蛋白片段降低苏云金芽孢杆菌Cry1Ac对棉铃虫的毒性
J Insect Physiol. 2009 Aug;55(8):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 May 26.
9
Development and mechanisms of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin Cry1Ac in the American bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner).棉铃虫对苏云金芽孢杆菌内毒素Cry1Ac的抗性发育及其机制
Indian J Exp Biol. 2004 Feb;42(2):164-73.
10
Mutation of an aminopeptidase N gene is associated with Helicoverpa armigera resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin.氨肽酶N基因的突变与棉铃虫对苏云金芽孢杆菌Cry1Ac毒素的抗性相关。
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2009 Jul;39(7):421-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Disruption of HaVipR1 confers Vip3Aa resistance in the moth crop pest Helicoverpa armigera.破坏棉铃虫中肠的HaVipR1可使其对Vip3Aa产生抗性,棉铃虫是一种蛾类作物害虫。
PLoS Biol. 2025 May 29;23(5):e3003165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003165. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Cry1 resistance in a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HaCad1 gene knockout strain of the Australian cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera conferta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).在澳大利亚棉铃虫Helicoverpa armigera conferta(鳞翅目:夜蛾科)的CRISPR/Cas9介导的HaCad1基因敲除品系中的Cry1抗性。
Pest Manag Sci. 2025 Feb;81(2):959-965. doi: 10.1002/ps.8500. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
3
Resistance of Lepidopteran Pests to Toxins: Evidence of Field and Laboratory Evolved Resistance and Cross-Resistance, Mode of Resistance Inheritance, Fitness Costs, Mechanisms Involved and Management Options.
鳞翅目害虫对毒素的抗性:田间和实验室进化抗性和交叉抗性的证据、抗性遗传模式、适合度代价、涉及的机制和管理选择。
Toxins (Basel). 2024 Jul 12;16(7):315. doi: 10.3390/toxins16070315.
4
Fitness Costs and Incomplete Resistance Associated with Delayed Evolution of Practical Resistance to Bt Crops.与Bt作物实际抗性延迟进化相关的适合度代价和不完全抗性
Insects. 2023 Feb 21;14(3):214. doi: 10.3390/insects14030214.
5
Realized Heritability, Risk Assessment, and Inheritance Pattern in (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Resistant to Dipel ( Kurstaki).二化螟(鳞翅目:夜蛾科)对苏云金杆菌(Kurstaki)的抗性的实现遗传力、风险评估和遗传模式。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Oct 6;14(10):686. doi: 10.3390/toxins14100686.
6
Molecular and Kinetic Models for Pore Formation of Cry Toxin.Cry 毒素孔形成的分子和动力学模型。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Jun 24;14(7):433. doi: 10.3390/toxins14070433.
7
Transcriptional Analysis of Cotton Bollworm Strains with Different Genetic Mechanisms of Resistance and Their Response to Cry1Ac Toxin.不同遗传机制抗棉铃虫品系的转录组分析及其对 Cry1Ac 毒素的反应。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 May 25;14(6):366. doi: 10.3390/toxins14060366.
8
Evaluating Cross-Resistance to Cry and Vip Toxins in Four Strains of With Different Genetic Mechanisms of Resistance to Bt Toxin Cry1Ac.评估四株对Bt毒素Cry1Ac具有不同抗性遗传机制的菌株对Cry和Vip毒素的交叉抗性。
Front Microbiol. 2021 May 14;12:670402. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.670402. eCollection 2021.
9
The Essential and Enigmatic Role of ABC Transporters in Bt Resistance of Noctuids and Other Insect Pests of Agriculture.ABC转运蛋白在夜蛾科昆虫及其他农业害虫对Bt抗性中的重要且神秘的作用
Insects. 2021 Apr 28;12(5):389. doi: 10.3390/insects12050389.
10
The Cadherin Protein Is Not Involved in Susceptibility to Cry1Ab or Cry1Fa Toxins in .钙黏蛋白蛋白不参与 Cry1Ab 或 Cry1Fa 毒素对 的易感性。
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Jun 6;12(6):375. doi: 10.3390/toxins12060375.