Kraytsberg Y, Nicholas A, Caro P, Khrapko K
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Methods. 2008 Dec;46(4):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Oct 26.
The area of somatic mtDNA mutation measurement is in a crisis because the methods used to quantify mtDNA mutations produce results varying by multiple orders of magnitude. The reason for these discrepancies is not clear, but given that most methods involve PCR, the prime suspect is PCR artifacts (e.g. spontaneous errors by the DNA polymerases used). In addition to simple misincorporation, another important source of artificial mutations is the conversion of chemically modified (e.g. damaged) nucleotides into mutations when bypassed by a thermostable DNA polymerase. These latter mutations are particularly difficult to account for because appropriate controls are not available. Here, we argue that single molecule PCR (smPCR) is uniquely positioned to account for these bypass-related artificial mutations and discuss the methodology involved in employing this technique.
体细胞线粒体DNA突变测量领域正处于危机之中,因为用于量化线粒体DNA突变的方法所产生的结果相差多个数量级。这些差异的原因尚不清楚,但鉴于大多数方法都涉及聚合酶链反应(PCR),主要嫌疑对象是PCR假象(例如所用DNA聚合酶的自发错误)。除了简单的错误掺入外,人工突变的另一个重要来源是当热稳定DNA聚合酶绕过化学修饰(如受损)的核苷酸时,这些核苷酸会转化为突变。后一种突变尤其难以解释,因为没有合适的对照。在此,我们认为单分子PCR(smPCR)在解释这些与绕过相关的人工突变方面具有独特的地位,并讨论了采用该技术所涉及的方法。