Cain Daphne S
Louisiana State University, 311 Huey P. Long Field House, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Soc Work Health Care. 2008;47(2):174-84. doi: 10.1080/00981380801970343.
Professional consensus exists against the spanking of infants based on the risk of escalation and injury. Moreover, infants are unable to recognize connections between their behavior and punishment and to modify their behavior in response. However, pediatricians and other health care professionals do not frequently discuss the issue of infant spanking with parents. Meanwhile, parents are increasingly seeking parenting information from other sources including the Internet and lay parenting books. Using content analysis methodology, online parenting sites and popular "how to" parenting books were reviewed with regard to the advisability of corporal punishment with infants. Results reveal that although the vast majority of online and popular print literature on infant parenting is developmentally sound, a small constituency of spanking advocates does exist. Given that some of the information available to parents contradicts professional consensus against the spanking of infants, it seems important for professionals concerned with the well being of infants to address the gaps in information and inherent dangers of infant spanking.
基于升级和受伤风险,专业人士达成共识,反对对婴儿进行体罚。此外,婴儿无法认识到自己行为与惩罚之间的联系,也无法据此改变自己的行为。然而,儿科医生和其他医疗保健专业人员并不经常与家长讨论对婴儿进行体罚的问题。与此同时,家长越来越多地从包括互联网和通俗育儿书籍在内的其他来源寻求育儿信息。运用内容分析法,对在线育儿网站和流行的“如何做”育儿书籍中关于对婴儿进行体罚的可取性进行了审查。结果显示,尽管绝大多数关于婴儿育儿的在线和通俗印刷文献在发育方面是合理的,但确实存在一小部分支持体罚的人。鉴于家长可获取的一些信息与反对对婴儿进行体罚的专业共识相矛盾,关注婴儿福祉的专业人员填补信息空白并指出对婴儿进行体罚的固有危险似乎很重要。