Jivrajka Renu V, Kim Janet K, Fink Wolfgang, Sadun Alfredo A, Sebag J
VMR Institute, 7677 Center Avenue, Suite 400, Huntington Beach, CA 92647, USA.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;247(2):165-70. doi: 10.1007/s00417-008-0971-8. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
To evaluate the central visual field (CVF) with specialized Amsler grid testing methods that include contrast sensitivity evaluation, in an attempt to detect abnormalities not identified with standard methods and to define new patterns of CVF deficits in two different diseases.
3D computer-automated threshold Amsler grid testing (3D-CTAG) was performed at five levels of contrast in one eye of 37 patients with diabetic macular edema (DME, n = 16) and exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD, n = 21).
3D-CTAG abnormalities were detected in six patients (16%) who had no abnormalities with conventional Amsler grid testing. DME patients had more foci of CVF deficits (3.56 +/- 2.92 defects/eye), than AMD patients (1.24 +/- 0.89 defects/eye; P < 0.0002). The shape of the 3D-CTAG abnormality in DME was an inverted cone, while the deficits in AMD were always cylindrical. All eyes showed significant increases in CVF deficit surface area at minimum contrast levels when compared to maximum contrast (295% greater with DME, P < 0.02 and 150% greater with AMD, P < 0.03).
3D-CTAG detected CVF abnormalities not identified with conventional Amsler grid testing in 16% of subjects. Low-contrast conditions elicited a larger defect in both DME (3-fold) and AMD (1.5-fold). DME and AMD have unique 3D-CTAG profiles, enabling diagnostic discrimination. Measuring CVF defects with 3D-CTAG can quantitatively index disease severity and may be useful in longitudinal studies of the natural history of disease, as well as providing a quantitative outcome measure of the response to therapy.
采用包括对比敏感度评估在内的专门阿姆斯勒方格测试方法评估中心视野(CVF),试图检测出标准方法未识别出的异常情况,并确定两种不同疾病中CVF缺损的新模式。
对37例糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME,n = 16)和渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD,n = 21)患者的一只眼睛,在五个对比度水平上进行三维计算机自动阈值阿姆斯勒方格测试(3D - CTAG)。
在6例(16%)常规阿姆斯勒方格测试无异常的患者中检测到3D - CTAG异常。DME患者的CVF缺损灶(3.56±2.92个/眼)比AMD患者(1.24±0.89个/眼;P < 0.0002)更多。DME中3D - CTAG异常的形状为倒锥形,而AMD中的缺损总是圆柱形。与最大对比度相比,所有眼睛在最低对比度水平时CVF缺损表面积均显著增加(DME增加295%,P < 0.02;AMD增加150%,P < 0.03)。
3D - CTAG在16%的受试者中检测到了常规阿姆斯勒方格测试未识别出的CVF异常。低对比度条件下,DME(3倍)和AMD(1.5倍)的缺损都更大。DME和AMD具有独特的3D - CTAG特征,有助于诊断鉴别。用3D - CTAG测量CVF缺损可定量评估疾病严重程度,可能有助于疾病自然史的纵向研究,也可为治疗反应提供定量结果指标。