Tsuboi Kazuto, Omura Nobuo, Yano Fumiaki, Kashiwagi Hideyuki, Yanaga Katsuhiko
Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(10):798-802. doi: 10.1007/s00535-008-2228-z. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
Kusano et al. developed a questionnaire for the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG). The FSSG is now widely used in Japan. We investigated the relationship between FSSG results and cardiac sphincter endoscopic findings.
The subjects were 470 patients who responded to the FSSG before undergoing endoscopy. From the FSSG results, we calculated the total, acid reflux, and dysmotility scores. Endoscopic findings were assessed in terms of the anatomic-functional-pathological (AFP) classification as the A factor, or degree and type of hiatal hernia, and the valve factor, or laxity of the cardiac sphincter. The degree of esophagitis was assessed using the modified Los Angeles classification. We investigated correlations between each score and the anatomy of the cardia.
With either definition of esophagitis (grade M or greater, or grade A or greater), the total and acid reflux scores were both significantly higher in the group with reflux esophagitis than in the group without reflux esophagitis. Examination of the relationship between FSSG scores and the A factor revealed no significant differences in the total, acid reflux, or dysmotility scores whether a hiatal hernia was present or absent. Similarly, examination of the valve factor showed no significant difference in any scores between V0 and V1 versus V1 and V2, indicating no correlation between cardiac sphincter laxity and FSSG scores.
The FSSG was useful in determining whether reflux esophagitis is present, but it did not predict the anatomy of the cardia.
草野等人开发了一种用于评估胃食管反流病(GERD)的问卷,即GERD症状频率量表(FSSG)。FSSG目前在日本被广泛使用。我们研究了FSSG结果与贲门括约肌内镜检查结果之间的关系。
研究对象为470例在内镜检查前对FSSG做出回应的患者。根据FSSG结果,我们计算了总分、酸反流分数和动力障碍分数。内镜检查结果根据解剖 - 功能 - 病理(AFP)分类进行评估,作为A因素,即食管裂孔疝的程度和类型,以及瓣膜因素,即贲门括约肌的松弛程度。食管炎的程度使用改良的洛杉矶分类法进行评估。我们研究了每个分数与贲门解剖结构之间的相关性。
无论采用哪种食管炎定义(M级或更高,或A级或更高),反流性食管炎组的总分和酸反流分数均显著高于无反流性食管炎组。对FSSG分数与A因素之间关系的检查显示,无论是否存在食管裂孔疝,总分、酸反流分数或动力障碍分数均无显著差异。同样,对瓣膜因素的检查显示,V0与V1以及V1与V2之间在任何分数上均无显著差异,表明贲门括约肌松弛与FSSG分数之间无相关性。
FSSG有助于确定是否存在反流性食管炎,但它无法预测贲门的解剖结构。