• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds.

作者信息

Coolen R, Van Jaarsveld H J, Schreuder R

机构信息

Interfaculty Research Unit for Language and Speech (IWTS), University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1991 Jul;19(4):341-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03197138.

DOI:10.3758/bf03197138
PMID:1895944
Abstract

The lexical decision task was used to investigate interpretative processing of isolated novel compounds (noun-noun nominals). On the basis of interpretability ratings, novel compounds were classified as being of either high or low interpretability. In a lexical decision task in which novel compounds functioned as nonwords, a significant interference effect was found for compounds of high interpretability. In a naming task, no differences were found between the two types of novel compounds, but lexicalized compounds resulted in shorter latencies than did novel compounds. Novel compounds were also shown to be interpreted under conditions unfavorable to morphological decomposition, suggesting that the interpretation process is beyond strategic control by the subject. Equal semantic priming effects were obtained for members of established semantic categories and nouns of highly interpretable compounds. Interpretative processes dealing with a limited set of basic semantic relations and analogy with lexicalized compounds are discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds.
Mem Cognit. 1991 Jul;19(4):341-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03197138.
2
Implicit access to semantic information.对语义信息的隐式访问。
Brain Cogn. 1989 Nov;11(2):186-209. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(89)90017-1.
3
Processing novel compounds: evidence for interactive meaning activation of ambiguous nouns.
Mem Cognit. 1993 Mar;21(2):235-46. doi: 10.3758/bf03202736.
4
Novel word integration in the mental lexicon: evidence from unmasked and masked semantic priming.心理词库中的新型词汇整合:来自无掩蔽和掩蔽语义启动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):1001-25. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.724694. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
5
Lexical coherence in short-term memory: strategic reconstruction or "semantic glue"?短期记忆中的词汇连贯:策略性重构还是“语义黏合剂”?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Oct;62(10):1967-82. doi: 10.1080/17470210802697672. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
6
That's the way the cookie bounces: syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blends.事情就是这样:实验诱发的习语混合的句法和语义成分。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Jan;25(1):57-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03197285.
7
Lexical decision in children: sublexical processing or lexical search?儿童的词汇判断:次词汇加工还是词汇搜索?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1214-28. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.652136. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
8
The association between age and the frequency of nouns selected for production.年龄与用于产出的名词频率之间的关联。
Psychol Aging. 2009 Mar;24(1):17-27. doi: 10.1037/a0014579.
9
Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.词汇判断、命名和语义分类任务中的歧义与同义词效应:正字法、音系学和语义学之间的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):686-713.
10
Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.大声朗读中的语义参与:来自非词训练研究的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1495-517. doi: 10.1037/a0013357.

引用本文的文献

1
Language experience shapes relational knowledge of compound words.语言经验塑造复合词的关系知识。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1468-1487. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1478-x.
2
Competition between conceptual relations affects compound recognition: the role of entropy.概念关系之间的竞争影响复合词识别:熵的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):556-70. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0926-0.
3
Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds.电生理学证据表明,英语复合词是基于词素的组合加工。

本文引用的文献

1
Ad hoc categories.特设类别。
Mem Cognit. 1983 May;11(3):211-27. doi: 10.3758/bf03196968.
2
A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.一个单词的含义会影响词汇判断中的决策。
Mem Cognit. 1984 Nov;12(6):590-606. doi: 10.3758/bf03213348.
3
Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.语境对单词识别影响的词前和词后位点。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2014;31(1-2):123-46. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.855633. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
4
When concepts combine.当概念结合。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):167-83. doi: 10.3758/BF03209392.
5
Eye movements during the reading of compound words and the influence of lexeme meaning.阅读复合词时的眼动及词位意义的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Apr;36(3):675-87. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.3.675.
6
Property instantiation in conceptual combination.概念组合中的属性实例化。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Nov;26(6):1330-47. doi: 10.3758/bf03201205.
7
Processing novel compounds: evidence for interactive meaning activation of ambiguous nouns.
Mem Cognit. 1993 Mar;21(2):235-46. doi: 10.3758/bf03202736.
Mem Cognit. 1984 Jul;12(4):315-28. doi: 10.3758/bf03198291.
4
Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions.自然概念联结中属性的继承
Mem Cognit. 1987 Jan;15(1):55-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03197712.
5
Types of linguistic knowledge: interpreting and producing compound nouns.
J Child Lang. 1987 Oct;14(3):547-67. doi: 10.1017/s030500090001028x.
6
Context and structure in conceptual combination.概念组合中的语境与结构
Cogn Psychol. 1988 Apr;20(2):158-90. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(88)90018-7.
7
Lexical access and inflectional morphology.词汇通达与屈折形态学
Cognition. 1988 Apr;28(3):297-332. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0.
8
The time course of sense creation.
Mem Cognit. 1989 Mar;17(2):194-207. doi: 10.3758/bf03197069.