Löfhede J, Löfgren N, Thordstein M, Flisberg A, Kjellmer I, Lindecrantz K
School of Engineering, University College of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
J Neural Eng. 2008 Dec;5(4):402-10. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/005. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
Fisher's linear discriminant (FLD), a feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) and a support vector machine (SVM) were compared with respect to their ability to distinguish bursts from suppressions in electroencephalograms (EEG) displaying a burst-suppression pattern. Five features extracted from the EEG were used as inputs. The study was based on EEG signals from six full-term infants who had suffered from perinatal asphyxia, and the methods have been trained with reference data classified by an experienced electroencephalographer. The results are summarized as the area under the curve (AUC), derived from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the three methods. Based on this, the SVM performs slightly better than the others. Testing the three methods with combinations of increasing numbers of the five features shows that the SVM handles the increasing amount of information better than the other methods.
对费舍尔线性判别法(FLD)、前馈人工神经网络(ANN)和支持向量机(SVM)区分呈现爆发抑制模式的脑电图(EEG)中爆发与抑制的能力进行了比较。从脑电图中提取的五个特征用作输入。该研究基于六名患有围产期窒息的足月儿的脑电图信号,并且这些方法已使用由经验丰富的脑电图专家分类的参考数据进行了训练。结果总结为曲线下面积(AUC),其源自三种方法的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。基于此,支持向量机的表现略优于其他方法。用五个特征数量不断增加的组合对这三种方法进行测试表明,支持向量机比其他方法能更好地处理不断增加的信息量。