Heran Manraj K S, Heran Navraj S, Shemie Sam D
Division of Neuroradiology, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia, Canada.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2008 Sep;35(4):409-19. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100009069.
The neurological determination of death (NDD) is primarily considered to be clinical. However, situations may arise where confounding factors make this clinical assessment difficult or impossible. As a result, ancillary tests have been developed in order to aid in the confirmation of brain death. As assessment of neuronal electrical activity; electroencephalography (EEG) is no longer recommended in this determination, tools assessing cerebral perfusion, as reflected by the presence or absence of cerebral blood flow (CBF), are the mainstay of NDD. The preferred ancillary test currently is Hexamethylpropylene amine oxime-single photon emission computed tomography (HMPAO SPECT) radionuclide angiography. When this is not available, or is equivocal, 4-vessel cerebral angiography can be used to determine the presence or absence of intracranial blood flow. However, as cerebral angiography has its own limitations, other techniques are sought by physicians in the Intensive Care and Neuro-intensive Care settings to replace cerebral angiography. In this article, we briefly review the history of diagnosis of brain death, pathophysiologic issues in making this determination, and currently available CBF imaging techniques, discussing each in turn with respect to their utility in the diagnosis of brain death.
神经学上的死亡判定(NDD)主要被认为是临床判定。然而,可能会出现一些情况,即混杂因素使得这种临床评估变得困难或无法进行。因此,已经开发了辅助检查来协助确认脑死亡。作为评估神经元电活动的手段,脑电图(EEG)在这种判定中不再被推荐,评估脑灌注的工具,以脑血流(CBF)的存在或不存在为反映,是NDD的主要手段。目前首选的辅助检查是六甲基丙烯胺肟 - 单光子发射计算机断层扫描(HMPAO SPECT)放射性核素血管造影。当这种检查不可用时,或者结果不明确时,可以使用四血管脑血管造影来确定颅内血流的存在或不存在。然而,由于脑血管造影有其自身的局限性,重症监护和神经重症监护环境中的医生正在寻求其他技术来取代脑血管造影。在本文中,我们简要回顾脑死亡诊断的历史、做出这种判定时的病理生理问题以及目前可用的CBF成像技术,并依次讨论它们在脑死亡诊断中的效用。