De Groote Sandra L
Assistant Professor and Assistant Health Sciences Librarian, Library of the Health Sciences (Peoria), University of Illinois at Chicago, P.O. Box 1649, One Illini Drive, Peoria, IL 61656, USA.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2008 Oct;96(4):362-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.96.4.012.
The research assesses the impact of online journals on citation patterns by examining whether researchers were more likely to limit the resources they cited to those journals available online rather than those only in print.
Publications from a large urban university with a medical college at an urban location and at a smaller regional location were examined. The number of online journals available to authors on either campus was the same. The number of print journals available on the large campus was much greater than the print journals available at the small campus.
Searches by author affiliation from 1996 to 2005 were performed in the Web of Science to find all articles written by affiliated members in the college of medicine at the selected institution. Cited references from randomly selected articles were recorded, and the cited journals were coded into five categories based on their availability at the study institution: print only, print and online, online only, not owned, and dropped. Results were analyzed using SPSS. The age of articles cited for selected years as well as for 2006 and 2007 was also examined.
The number of journals cited each year continued to increase. On the large urban campus, researchers were not more likely to cite journals available online or less likely to cite journals only in print. At the regional location, at which the number of print-only journals was minimal, use of print-only journals significantly decreased.
CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: The citation of print-only journals by researchers with access to a library with a large print and electronic collection appeared to continue, despite the availability of potential alternatives in the online collection. Journals available in electronic format were cited more frequently in publications from the campus whose library had a small print collection, and the citation of journals available in both print and electronic formats generally increased over the years studied.
本研究通过考察研究人员是否更倾向于将所引用的资源局限于在线可得的期刊,而非仅印刷版的期刊,来评估在线期刊对引文模式的影响。
对一所位于城市的大型大学(设有医学院)以及一所较小的地区性大学的出版物进行了考察。两所校园中作者可获取的在线期刊数量相同。大学校园的印刷版期刊数量远多于小学校园。
在《科学引文索引》中按作者所属机构进行检索,以查找选定机构医学院附属成员在1996年至2005年间撰写的所有文章。记录随机选取文章的参考文献引用情况,并根据研究机构中期刊的可得性将所引用期刊分为五类:仅印刷版、印刷版和在线版、仅在线版、未拥有、排除。使用SPSS对结果进行分析。还考察了选定年份以及2006年和2007年所引用文章的年份。
每年引用的期刊数量持续增加。在大型城市校园,研究人员引用在线可得期刊的可能性并未增加,引用仅印刷版期刊的可能性也未降低。在地区性校园,仅印刷版期刊数量极少,仅印刷版期刊的使用显著减少。
结论/讨论:尽管在线馆藏中有潜在的替代资源,但对于可使用拥有大量印刷版和电子版馆藏图书馆的研究人员而言,他们对仅印刷版期刊的引用似乎仍在继续。在图书馆印刷版馆藏较少的校园的出版物中,以电子格式提供的期刊被引用得更频繁,并且在研究的这些年里,印刷版和电子格式都有的期刊的引用总体上有所增加。