Suppr超能文献

在线期刊:对纸质期刊使用情况的影响。

Online journals: impact on print journal usage.

作者信息

De Groote S L, Dorsch J L

机构信息

Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria, University of Illinois at Chicago, Peoria 61656, USA.

出版信息

Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2001 Oct;89(4):372-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The research sought to determine the impact of online journals on the use of print journals and interlibrary loan (ILL).

SETTING

The Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria is a regional site of the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Library with a print journal collection of approximately 400 titles. Since 1999, UIC site licenses have given students and faculty affiliated with UIC-Peoria access to more than 4,000 online full-text journal titles through the Internet.

METHODOLOGY

The Library of the Health Sciences-Peoria has conducted a journal-use study over an extended period of time. The information collected from this study was used to assess the impact of 104 online journals, added to the collection in January 1999, on the use of print journals.

RESULTS

Results of the statistical analysis showed print journal usage decreased significantly since the introduction of online journals (F(1,147) = 12.10, P < 0.001). This decrease occurred regardless of whether a journal was available only in print or both online and in print. Interlibrary loan requests have also significantly decreased since the introduction of online journals (F(2,30) = 4.46, P < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in use of the print collection suggests that many patrons prefer to access journals online. The negative impact the online journals have had on the use of the journal titles available only in print suggests users may be compromising quality for convenience when selecting journal articles. Possible implications for collection development are discussed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在线期刊对纸质期刊使用及馆际互借(ILL)的影响。

背景

健康科学图书馆 - 皮奥里亚分馆是伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校(UIC)图书馆的一个区域分馆,拥有约400种纸质期刊。自1999年以来,UIC的站点许可使皮奥里亚分校的学生和教师能够通过互联网访问4000多种在线全文期刊。

方法

健康科学图书馆 - 皮奥里亚分馆在较长一段时间内开展了一项期刊使用情况研究。该研究收集的信息用于评估1999年1月新增的104种在线期刊对纸质期刊使用的影响。

结果

统计分析结果表明,自引入在线期刊以来,纸质期刊的使用量显著下降(F(1,147) = 12.10,P < 0.001)。无论期刊是仅提供纸质版还是同时提供在线和纸质版,这种下降都出现了。自引入在线期刊以来,馆际互借请求也显著减少(F(2,30) = 4.46,P < 0.02)。

结论

纸质馆藏使用量的下降表明许多读者更喜欢在线获取期刊。在线期刊对仅提供纸质版的期刊使用产生的负面影响表明,用户在选择期刊文章时可能为了方便而牺牲了质量。文中讨论了对馆藏发展可能产生的影响。

相似文献

1
Online journals: impact on print journal usage.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2001 Oct;89(4):372-8.
3
Citation patterns of online and print journals in the digital age.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2008 Oct;96(4):362-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.96.4.012.
6
Measuring use patterns of online journals and databases.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2003 Apr;91(2):231-40.
9
Using a journal availability study to improve access.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2001 Jan;89(1):21-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Health sciences faculty publication patterns and related information-seeking behavior.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;112(2):73-80. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1789. Epub 2024 May 22.
2
Problems and challenges of predatory journals.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Sep;32(9):1441-1449. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15039. Epub 2018 May 29.
3
Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 8;10(10):e0139951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139951. eCollection 2015.
4
Physicians reading and writing practices: a cross-sectional study from Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 27;12:76. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-76.
5
Citation patterns of online and print journals in the digital age.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2008 Oct;96(4):362-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.96.4.012.
6
Interlibrary loan in US and Canadian health sciences libraries 2005: update on journal article use.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Apr;95(2):189-94. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.95.2.189.
7
Journal reading patterns and preferences of pediatricians.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Jan;95(1):56-63.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验