• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

封闭式气管内吸痰系统的实验性污染:24小时与72小时对比

Experimental contamination of a closed endotracheal suction system: 24 h vs 72 h.

作者信息

Meyer E, Schuhmacher M, Ebner W, Dettenkofer M

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Infection. 2009 Feb;37(1):49-51. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-7444-1. Epub 2008 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1007/s15010-008-7444-1
PMID:18974929
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the desirability of replacing closed suction systems after 72 h rather than after 24 h (manufacturer's recommendations) because it is possible that a reduction in the frequency of manipulations might reduce the risk of exogenous nosocomial pneumonia. We investigated the presence of time-dependent differences (after 24 h and 72 h) in pathogen survival/growth in artificially contaminated closed suction catheters (OptiFlo).

DESIGN

The trial simulated bacterial contamination of the airways using a suspension of 2 x 10(3) CFU/ml of Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Contamination was performed on a total of 80 catheters. Forty were contaminated a total of eight times every 45-60 min. Another 40 catheters underwent the same procedure 24 times over three consecutive days. Microbiological analysis of the catheters took place after 24 h and 72 h, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean S. aureus load was 9.4 CFU/catheter after eight suction procedures and 6.2 CFU/catheter after 24 suction procedures (3 days). Mean growth of P. aeruginosa was 5.3 CFU/catheter, and 8.2 CFU/catheter after 3 days. There was no statistically significant difference between day 1 and 3 for S. aureus (p = 0.474), but there was for P. aeruginosa (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that, from an experimental point of view, it remains controversial whether routine change of closed suction catheters can be extended from 24 h to 72 h. However, clinical evidence suggests that prolonged use of a closed suctioning system is safe.

摘要

目的

确定在72小时而非24小时(制造商建议时间)后更换封闭式吸痰系统是否可取,因为减少操作频率可能会降低外源性医院获得性肺炎的风险。我们研究了人工污染的封闭式吸痰导管(OptiFlo)中病原体存活/生长情况随时间(24小时和72小时后)的差异。

设计

该试验使用每毫升含2×10³CFU的金黄色葡萄球菌或铜绿假单胞菌悬液模拟气道细菌污染。共对80根导管进行污染。40根导管每隔45 - 60分钟共污染8次。另外40根导管在连续三天内共进行24次相同操作。分别在24小时和72小时后对导管进行微生物分析。

结果

8次吸痰操作后金黄色葡萄球菌平均载量为每根导管9.4 CFU,24次吸痰操作(3天)后为每根导管6.2 CFU。铜绿假单胞菌平均生长量为每根导管5.3 CFU,3天后为每根导管8.2 CFU。金黄色葡萄球菌在第1天和第3天之间无统计学显著差异(p = 0.474),但铜绿假单胞菌有差异(p = 0.004)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,从实验角度来看,封闭式吸痰导管的常规更换时间能否从24小时延长至72小时仍存在争议。然而,临床证据表明延长使用封闭式吸痰系统是安全的。

相似文献

1
Experimental contamination of a closed endotracheal suction system: 24 h vs 72 h.封闭式气管内吸痰系统的实验性污染:24小时与72小时对比
Infection. 2009 Feb;37(1):49-51. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-7444-1. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
2
A UVC device for intra-luminal disinfection of catheters: in vitro tests on soft polymer tubes contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans.一种用于导管腔内消毒的 UVC 装置:对软聚合物管内受绿脓假单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和白色念珠菌污染的体外测试。
Photochem Photobiol. 2011 Sep-Oct;87(5):1123-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00962.x. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
3
Synergy between Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a rat model of complex orthopaedic wounds.金黄色葡萄球菌与铜绿假单胞菌在复杂骨科伤口大鼠模型中的协同作用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Jun;83(6):855-61. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200106000-00006.
4
Prolonged application of closed in-line suction catheters increases microbial colonization of the lower respiratory tract and bacterial growth on catheter surface.
Infection. 2003 Jan;31(1):31-7. doi: 10.1007/s15010-002-3066-1.
5
Ropivacaine 0.1% with sufentanil 1 microg/mL inhibits in vitro growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and does not promote multiplication of Staphylococcus aureus.0.1%罗哌卡因与1微克/毫升舒芬太尼联用可抑制铜绿假单胞菌的体外生长,且不会促进金黄色葡萄球菌的增殖。
Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):409-411. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000067404.84486.7A.
6
Comparison of a closed (Trach Care MAC) with an open endotracheal suction system in small premature infants.小型早产儿中封闭式(气管护理MAC)与开放式气管内吸引系统的比较。
J Perinatol. 2000 Apr-May;20(3):151-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200330.
7
Microbial colonization of closed-system suction catheters used in liver transplant patients.肝移植患者使用的封闭式吸痰管的微生物定植
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1997 Apr;13(2):72-6. doi: 10.1016/s0964-3397(97)80135-8.
8
Contamination and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospital used sponges.医院使用海绵中铜绿假单胞菌的污染与存活情况
Microbios. 2001;105(412):175-81.
9
Contamination of multi-use closed tracheal suction catheters: an in-vitro study.复用封闭式气管内吸痰管的污染情况:一项体外研究。
J Hosp Infect. 1995 Nov;31(3):219-24. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(95)90069-1.
10
Antiseptic impregnated endotracheal tubes for the prevention of bacterial colonization.含抗菌剂气管内导管预防细菌定植
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Jun;57(2):170-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.03.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the effect of open and closed endotracheal suctioning on pain and oxygenation in post CABG patients under mechanical ventilation.比较开放式与封闭式气管内吸痰对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后机械通气患者疼痛及氧合的影响。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015 Mar-Apr;20(2):195-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Closed tracheal suction systems versus open tracheal suction systems for mechanically ventilated adult patients.用于机械通气成年患者的密闭式气管吸痰系统与开放式气管吸痰系统的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD004581. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004581.pub2.
2
Impact of the suctioning system (open vs. closed) on the incidence of ventilation-associated pneumonia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.吸痰系统(开放式与封闭式)对呼吸机相关性肺炎发病率的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Sep;32(9):1329-35. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0241-3. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
3
Tracheal suction by closed system without daily change versus open system.
采用无每日更换的密闭系统与开放系统进行气管吸引。
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Apr;32(4):538-44. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-0057-6. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
4
Endotracheal suctioning, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and costs: open or closed issue?
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Apr;32(4):485-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0093-x. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
5
Closed suctioning system reduces cross-contamination between bronchial system and gastric juices.封闭式吸痰系统可减少支气管系统与胃液之间的交叉污染。
Anesth Analg. 2004 Sep;99(3):886-92, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143353.85428.39.
6
Guidelines for preventing health-care--associated pneumonia, 2003: recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.《2003年预防医疗保健相关肺炎指南:美国疾病控制与预防中心及医疗保健感染控制实践咨询委员会的建议》
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004 Mar 26;53(RR-3):1-36.
7
Weekly versus daily changes of in-line suction catheters: impact on rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and associated costs.气管内吸引导管的每周更换与每日更换:对呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率及相关成本的影响。
Respir Care. 2003 May;48(5):494-9.
8
Prolonged application of closed in-line suction catheters increases microbial colonization of the lower respiratory tract and bacterial growth on catheter surface.
Infection. 2003 Jan;31(1):31-7. doi: 10.1007/s15010-002-3066-1.
9
Nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, a prospective randomised evaluation of the Stericath closed suctioning system.机械通气患者的医院获得性肺炎,Stericath封闭式吸痰系统的前瞻性随机评估。
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Jul;26(7):878-82. doi: 10.1007/s001340051276.
10
Comparison of a closed (Trach Care MAC) with an open endotracheal suction system in small premature infants.小型早产儿中封闭式(气管护理MAC)与开放式气管内吸引系统的比较。
J Perinatol. 2000 Apr-May;20(3):151-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200330.