Leitzmann Michael F, Moore Steven C, Peters Tricia M, Lacey James V, Schatzkin Arthur, Schairer Catherine, Brinton Louise A, Albanes Demetrius
Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(5):R92. doi: 10.1186/bcr2190. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
To prospectively examine the relation of total, vigorous and non-vigorous physical activity to postmenopausal breast cancer risk.
We studied 32,269 women enrolled in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project Follow-up Study. Usual physical activity (including household, occupational and leisure activities) throughout the previous year was assessed at baseline using a self-administered questionnaire. Postmenopausal breast cancer cases were identified through self-reports, death certificates and linkage to state cancer registries. A Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the relative risk and 95% confidence intervals of postmenopausal breast cancer associated with physical activity.
During 269,792 person-years of follow-up from 1987 to 1998, 1506 new incident cases of postmenopausal breast cancer were ascertained. After adjusting for potential risk factors of breast cancer, a weak inverse association between total physical activity and postmenopausal breast cancer was suggested (relative risk comparing extreme quintiles = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.74 to 1.02; p for trend = 0.21). That relation was almost entirely contributed by vigorous activity (relative risk comparing extreme categories = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.74 to 1.02; p for trend = 0.08). The inverse association with vigorous activity was limited to women who were lean (ie, body mass index <25.0 kg/m2: relative risk = 0.68; 95% confidence interval = 0.54 to 0.85). In contrast, no association with vigorous activity was noted among women who were overweight or obese (ie, body mass index > or = 25.0 kg/m2: relative risk = 1.18; 95% confidence interval = 0.93 to 1.49; p for interaction = 0.008). Non-vigorous activity showed no relation to breast cancer (relative risk comparing extreme quintiles = 1.02; 95% confidence interval = 0.87 to 1.19; p for trend = 0.86). The physical activity and breast cancer relation was not specific to a certain hormone receptor subtype.
In this cohort of postmenopausal women, breast cancer risk reduction appeared to be limited to vigorous forms of activity; it was apparent among normal weight women but not overweight women, and the relation did not vary by hormone receptor status. Our findings suggest that physical activity acts through underlying biological mechanisms that are independent of body weight control.
前瞻性研究总体、剧烈和非剧烈体力活动与绝经后乳腺癌风险之间的关系。
我们对参与乳腺癌检测示范项目随访研究的32269名女性进行了研究。使用一份自填式问卷在基线时评估前一年的日常体力活动(包括家务、职业和休闲活动)。通过自我报告、死亡证明以及与州癌症登记处的关联来确定绝经后乳腺癌病例。采用Cox比例风险回归来估计与体力活动相关的绝经后乳腺癌的相对风险和95%置信区间。
在1987年至1998年的269792人年随访期间,确定了1506例绝经后乳腺癌新发病例。在对乳腺癌的潜在风险因素进行调整后,总体力活动与绝经后乳腺癌之间存在微弱的负相关(比较极端五分位数的相对风险 = 0.87;95%置信区间 = 0.74至1.02;趋势p值 = 0.21)。这种关系几乎完全由剧烈活动导致(比较极端类别的相对风险 = 0.87;95%置信区间 = 0.74至1.02;趋势p值 = 0.08)。与剧烈活动的负相关仅限于体型瘦的女性(即体重指数<25.0 kg/m²:相对风险 = 0.68;95%置信区间 = 0.54至0.85)。相比之下,超重或肥胖女性(即体重指数≥25.0 kg/m²:相对风险 = 1.18;95%置信区间 = 0.93至1.49;交互作用p值 = 0.008)中未发现与剧烈活动有关联。非剧烈活动与乳腺癌无关(比较极端五分位数的相对风险 = 1.02;95%置信区间 = 0.87至1.19;趋势p值 = 0.86)。体力活动与乳腺癌的关系并非特定于某种激素受体亚型。
在这个绝经后女性队列中,乳腺癌风险的降低似乎仅限于剧烈形式的活动;在体重正常的女性中明显,但在超重女性中不明显,并且这种关系不会因激素受体状态而有所不同。我们的研究结果表明,体力活动通过独立于体重控制的潜在生物学机制发挥作用。