Suppr超能文献

通过毒素检测试剂盒诊断艰难梭菌感染:一项系统评价

Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review.

作者信息

Planche Tim, Aghaizu Adamma, Holliman Richard, Riley Peter, Poloniecki Jan, Breathnach Aodhán, Krishna Sanjeev

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, St George's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2008 Dec;8(12):777-84. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70233-0. Epub 2008 Nov 1.

Abstract

Clostridium difficile can be a fatal hospital-acquired infection and its prevalence has increased. Accurate diagnosis of C difficile is essential for patient management, infection control, and for defining its epidemiology. We did a systematic review of commonly used commercial assays for detection of C difficile toxin (CDT) A and B in stool samples. By comparison of detection of CDT in cell culture with or without selective culture for C difficile, the median sensitivities and specificities (IQR) were as follows: Meridian Premier 0.95 (0.86-0.97) and 0.97 (0.95-0.98), TechLab Tox A/B II 0.83 (0.82-0.85) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00), TechLab Tox A/B Quik Chek 0.84 (0.81-0.87) and 1.00 (0.99-1.00), Remel Xpect 0.82 (0.75-0.89) and 0.96 (0.95-0.98), Meridian Immunocard 0.90 (0.84-0.92) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00), and BioMérieux VIDAS 0.76 and 0.93. If the prevalence of CDT A and B in stool samples is relatively low (<10%), the positive predictive value of these assays is unacceptably low (eg, <50% in some circumstances) and will vary depending on the assay and number of samples tested. This low positive predictive value impinges on clinical management, outbreaks, and makes epidemiological data unreliable. To improve diagnosis, we suggest a two-stage testing strategy for C difficile toxin with an initial highly sensitive rapid screening test to identify positive samples that are then confirmed by a reference method.

摘要

艰难梭菌可导致致命的医院获得性感染,其发病率呈上升趋势。准确诊断艰难梭菌对于患者管理、感染控制以及明确其流行病学特征至关重要。我们对用于检测粪便样本中艰难梭菌毒素(CDT)A和B的常用商业检测方法进行了系统评价。通过比较在有或没有对艰难梭菌进行选择性培养的细胞培养中CDT的检测情况,中位敏感性和特异性(四分位间距)如下:Meridian Premier分别为0.95(0.86 - 0.97)和0.97(0.95 - 0.98),TechLab Tox A/B II分别为0.83(0.82 - 0.85)和0.99(0.98 - 1.00),TechLab Tox A/B Quik Chek分别为0.84(0.81 - 0.87)和1.00(0.99 - 1.00),Remel Xpect分别为0.82(0.75 - 0.89)和0.96(0.95 - 0.98),Meridian Immunocard分别为0.90(0.84 - 0.92)和0.99(0.98 - 1.00),以及BioMérieux VIDAS分别为0.76和0.93。如果粪便样本中CDT A和B的患病率相对较低(<10%),这些检测方法的阳性预测值低得令人无法接受(例如,在某些情况下<50%),并且会因检测方法和检测样本数量而异。这种低阳性预测值会影响临床管理、疫情爆发,并使流行病学数据不可靠。为了改善诊断,我们建议采用两阶段检测策略检测艰难梭菌毒素,首先进行高敏感性的快速筛查试验以识别阳性样本,然后通过参考方法进行确认。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验