• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估使用儿童镇痛轮时处方准确性的随机试验。

A randomised trial to evaluate prescribing accuracy when using the Paediatric Analgesia Wheel.

作者信息

Hixson R, Gandhi M, Holton F

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Darlington Memorial Hospital, Hollyhurst Road, Darlington, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2009 Apr;94(4):268-72. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.142380. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1136/adc.2008.142380
PMID:18977787
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of prescribing analgesic and anti-emetic drugs to children when using either the 2006 BNF for children (BNFC) or a new device, the Paediatric Analgesia Wheel.

STUDY DESIGN

A simulated prescription chart was created requiring doctors to prescribe seven drugs to each of two children (14 prescriptions in total). 52 doctors from anaesthesia, paediatrics and emergency medicine were recruited and randomly assigned to complete the chart using either the BNFC or a new device, the Paediatric Analgesia Wheel. The mean number of correct answers and mean time taken to complete the chart were compared.

RESULTS

Prescribing using the Paediatric Analgesia Wheel resulted in a significantly greater number of correct answers (mean 10.9) compared with using the BNFC (mean 3.5). In addition, the mean time taken to complete the prescription chart was significantly shorter when using the Paediatric Analgesia Wheel (5.8 min) compared with the BNFC (12.4 min).

CONCLUSIONS

The Paediatric Analgesia Wheel provides a time-efficient method of prescribing commonly used analgesic and anti-emetic drugs to children and results in improved accuracy when compared with using the BNFC.

摘要

目的

比较使用2006年儿童版英国国家处方集(BNFC)或一种新设备——儿童镇痛轮给儿童开具镇痛和止吐药物时的准确性。

研究设计

创建了一份模拟处方表,要求医生给两名儿童各开具七种药物(共14张处方)。招募了52名来自麻醉科、儿科和急诊科的医生,并随机分配他们使用BNFC或新设备儿童镇痛轮来填写处方表。比较正确答案的平均数和完成处方表所需的平均时间。

结果

与使用BNFC(平均3.5个)相比,使用儿童镇痛轮开具处方时正确答案的数量显著更多(平均10.9个)。此外,使用儿童镇痛轮完成处方表的平均时间(5.8分钟)显著短于使用BNFC的时间(12.4分钟)。

结论

与使用BNFC相比,儿童镇痛轮为给儿童开具常用镇痛和止吐药物提供了一种省时的方法,且准确性更高。

相似文献

1
A randomised trial to evaluate prescribing accuracy when using the Paediatric Analgesia Wheel.一项评估使用儿童镇痛轮时处方准确性的随机试验。
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Apr;94(4):268-72. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.142380. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
2
A simplified gentamicin dosing chart is quicker and more accurate for nurse verification than the BNFc.对于护士核对而言,一份简化的庆大霉素给药图表比《英国国家处方集儿童版》更快且更准确。
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Jul;94(7):542-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.137026. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
3
Students prescribing emergency drug infusions utilising smartphones outperform consultants using BNFCs.利用智能手机为患者开具急救药物输注医嘱的医学生,表现优于使用 BNFCs 的顾问医生。
Resuscitation. 2011 Nov;82(11):1424-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
4
Improved junior paediatric prescribing skills after a short e-learning intervention: a randomised controlled trial.短期电子学习干预后,儿童初级处方技能提高:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Dec;96(12):1191-4. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300577.
5
What constitutes a prescribing error in paediatrics?儿科中的处方错误是由什么构成的?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):352-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.013797.
6
Educational interventions to reduce prescribing errors.减少处方错误的教育干预措施。
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Apr;93(4):313-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.127761. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
7
The effect of a short tutorial on the incidence of prescribing errors in pediatric emergency care.简短教程对儿科急诊护理中处方错误发生率的影响。
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Fall;13(3):e285-91. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
8
Evidence of frequent dosing errors in paediatrics and intervention to reduce such prescribing errors.儿科频繁用药错误的证据及减少此类处方错误的干预措施。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014 Feb;39(1):78-83. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12114.
9
Paediatric analgesia in the emergency department, are we getting it right?急诊科的小儿镇痛,我们做得对吗?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;14(3):157-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3280b17e36.
10
Prescribing competence of junior doctors: does it add up?初级医生的处方能力:是否足够?
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Mar;95(3):219-21. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.156042. Epub 2009 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Harms in Paediatric Primary Care.儿科初级保健中的治疗危害。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 17;20(14):6378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146378.
2
Validation of a mobile app for reducing errors of administration of medications in an emergency.验证一款用于减少急诊用药错误的移动应用程序。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Jun;33(3):531-539. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0187-3. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
3
Interventions for reducing medication errors in children in hospital.减少住院儿童用药错误的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 10;2015(3):CD006208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006208.pub3.
4
Telemedicine consultations and medication errors in rural emergency departments.农村急诊科的远程医疗咨询和用药错误。
Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(6):1090-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1374. Epub 2013 Nov 25.