Witzel Joachim, Held Egbert, Bogerts Bernhard
Central State Forensic Psychiatric Hospital of Saxony-Anhalt, Uchtspringe, Germany, USA.
J ECT. 2009 Jun;25(2):129-32. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e318185fa55.
There is a widespread similarity between diagnoses in general psychiatry compared with those found in forensic psychiatry. Consequently, forensic psychiatrists face serious cases that need to undergo treatment by electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Although it is a well known and valid treatment, ECT is rarely applied to forensic-psychiatric patients or prisoners as well. This might be due to the general assumption that detained individuals, either in forensic psychiatry or in prisons, will not be chosen for a therapy, which is merely looked on as an emergency treatment. Besides, informed consent might be estimated not valid in such persons. However, the use of ECT in forensic psychiatry or prisons cannot be denied anymore because diagnoses and indications for ECT parallel the situation in general psychiatry. With the numbers of schizophrenic and depressive patients considerably increasing in the past years in our forensic unit, we estimate the indication for ECT in forensic psychiatry of approximately 3% and 12.5%, respectively.
普通精神病学的诊断与法医精神病学的诊断之间存在广泛的相似性。因此,法医精神病学家会面对一些需要接受电休克治疗(ECT)的严重病例。尽管ECT是一种广为人知且有效的治疗方法,但它很少应用于法医精神病患者或囚犯。这可能是由于人们普遍认为,无论是在法医精神病学领域还是在监狱中,被拘留者都不会被选为接受一种仅被视为紧急治疗的疗法。此外,知情同意在这类人群中可能被认为无效。然而,由于ECT的诊断和适应症与普通精神病学的情况相似,因此在法医精神病学或监狱中使用ECT已无法再被否认。在过去几年里,我们法医部门的精神分裂症患者和抑郁症患者数量大幅增加,我们估计法医精神病学中ECT的适应症分别约为3%和12.5%。