• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于测量焦虑的计算机自适应测试(A-CAT)的功能与效度。

Functioning and validity of a Computerized Adaptive Test to measure anxiety (A-CAT).

作者信息

Becker Janine, Fliege Herbert, Kocalevent Rüya-Daniela, Bjorner Jakob B, Rose Matthias, Walter Otto B, Klapp Burghard F

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(12):E182-94. doi: 10.1002/da.20482.

DOI:10.1002/da.20482
PMID:18979458
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the Computerized Adaptive Test to measure anxiety (A-CAT), a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that uses computerized adaptive testing to measure anxiety.

METHODS

The A-CAT builds on an item bank of 50 items that has been built using conventional item analyses and item response theory analyses. The A-CAT was administered on Personal Digital Assistants to n=357 patients diagnosed and treated at the department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Charité Berlin, Germany. For validation purposes, two subgroups of patients (n=110 and 125) answered the A-CAT along with established anxiety and depression questionnaires.

RESULTS

The A-CAT was fast to complete (on average in 2 min, 38 s) and a precise item response theory based CAT score (reliability>.9) could be estimated after 4-41 items. On average, the CAT displayed 6 items (SD=4.2). Convergent validity of the A-CAT was supported by correlations to existing tools (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-A, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Berliner Stimmungs-Fragebogen A/D, and State Trait Anxiety Inventory: r=.56-.66); discriminant validity between diagnostic groups was higher for the A-CAT than for other anxiety measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The German A-CAT is an efficient, reliable, and valid tool for assessing anxiety in patients suffering from anxiety disorders and other conditions with significant potential for initial assessment and long-term treatment monitoring. Future research directions are to explore content balancing of the item selection algorithm of the CAT, to norm the tool to a healthy sample, and to develop practical cutoff scores.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估用于测量焦虑的计算机自适应测试(A-CAT),这是一种患者报告结局问卷,采用计算机自适应测试来测量焦虑。

方法

A-CAT基于一个包含50个条目的题库构建,该题库使用传统的项目分析和项目反应理论分析构建而成。A-CAT在个人数字助理上对n = 357名在德国柏林夏里特医院身心医学与心理治疗科诊断和治疗的患者进行施测。为了进行效度验证,两组患者亚组(n = 110和125)在回答A-CAT的同时还回答了既定的焦虑和抑郁问卷。

结果

A-CAT完成速度快(平均用时2分38秒),在回答4 - 41个条目后即可估计出基于精确项目反应理论的CAT分数(信度>.9)。平均而言,CAT显示6个条目(标准差 = 4.2)。A-CAT与现有工具(医院焦虑抑郁量表-A、贝克焦虑量表、柏林情绪问卷A/D和状态特质焦虑量表)的相关性支持了其收敛效度(r =.56 -.66);A-CAT在诊断组之间的区分效度高于其他焦虑测量工具。

结论

德国版A-CAT是一种高效、可靠且有效的工具,可用于评估焦虑症患者以及其他有显著初始评估和长期治疗监测潜力的疾病患者的焦虑情况。未来的研究方向是探索CAT项目选择算法的内容平衡、将该工具标准化到健康样本以及制定实用的截断分数。

相似文献

1
Functioning and validity of a Computerized Adaptive Test to measure anxiety (A-CAT).用于测量焦虑的计算机自适应测试(A-CAT)的功能与效度。
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(12):E182-94. doi: 10.1002/da.20482.
2
[Motivation for psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic treatment of vocational stresses -- development and validation of a questionnaire].[职业压力的心身-心理治疗动机——一份问卷的编制与验证]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2005 Feb;44(1):14-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-834599.
3
A depressive symptom scale for the California Psychological Inventory: construct validation of the CPI-D.加利福尼亚心理调查表的抑郁症状量表:CPI-D的结构效度验证
Psychol Assess. 2004 Sep;16(3):299-309. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.299.
4
The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R): validation of the German version in a sample of patients with OCD, anxiety disorders, and depressive disorders.强迫观念与强迫行为量表修订版(OCI-R):在强迫症、焦虑症和抑郁症患者样本中对德文版的验证
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 May;22(4):734-49. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.07.007. Epub 2007 Aug 2.
5
[The Beck Anxiety Inventory. Psychometric properties of a French translation].[贝克焦虑量表。法语翻译的心理测量特性]
Encephale. 1994 Jan-Feb;20(1):47-55.
6
Symptoms of anxiety in depression: assessment of item performance of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale in patients with depression.抑郁症中的焦虑症状:汉密尔顿焦虑量表在抑郁症患者中的条目性能评估
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(12):1006-13. doi: 10.1002/da.20435.
7
Psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) in general population.一般人群中西班牙语版贝克焦虑量表(BAI)的心理测量特性。
Span J Psychol. 2008 Nov;11(2):626-40.
8
Abbreviated brief symptom inventory for use as an anxiety and depression screening instrument in primary care.用于初级保健中作为焦虑和抑郁筛查工具的简化简明症状量表。
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(6):537-43. doi: 10.1002/da.20471.
9
Psychometric properties of the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA): comparison to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).认知与躯体焦虑状态-特质量表(STICSA)的心理测量学特性:与状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2007 Dec;19(4):369-81. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.369.
10
Structure of the computer-assisted Beck Anxiety Inventory with psychiatric inpatients.计算机辅助贝克焦虑量表在精神科住院患者中的结构
J Pers Assess. 1993 Jun;60(3):532-42. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6003_10.

引用本文的文献

1
A pilot study of an online group-based Internal Family Systems intervention for comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use.一项针对创伤后应激障碍与物质使用共病患者的基于网络小组的内在家庭系统干预的试点研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 27;16:1544435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1544435. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of an electronic psycho-oncological adaptive screening program (EPAS) with immediate patient feedback: findings from a German cluster intervention study.电子心理肿瘤学自适应筛查程序(EPAS)与即时患者反馈评估:一项德国群组干预研究的结果。
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Dec;16(6):1401-1413. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01121-8. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
3
Computerized Adaptive Tests: Efficient and Precise Assessment of the Patient-Centered Impact of Diabetic Retinopathy.
计算机化自适应测试:高效且精准评估糖尿病视网膜病变对患者的影响。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Jun 3;9(7):3. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.7.3. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
What Technology Can and Cannot Do to Support Assessment of Non-cognitive Skills.技术在支持非认知技能评估方面能做什么及不能做什么。
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 25;10:2168. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02168. eCollection 2019.
5
Validation of the Computerized Adaptive Test for Mental Health in Primary Care.基层医疗心理健康计算机化自适应测验的验证。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jan;17(1):23-30. doi: 10.1370/afm.2316.
6
The development and validation of static and adaptive screeners to measure the severity of panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and obsessive compulsive disorder.静态和自适应筛查工具的开发和验证,以衡量惊恐障碍、社交焦虑障碍和强迫症的严重程度。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Dec;26(4). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1561. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
7
Applying Computerized Adaptive Testing to the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): A Simulation Study.将计算机自适应测试应用于四维症状问卷(4DSQ):一项模拟研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Feb 21;4(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/mental.6545.
8
Feasibility and acceptability of patient partnership to improve access to primary care for the physical health of patients with severe mental illnesses: an interactive guide.患者伙伴关系改善严重精神疾病患者获得初级医疗服务以促进其身体健康的可行性与可接受性:一份互动指南
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Sep 14;14:78. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0200-0.
9
Gender differences in a resources-demands model in the general population.普通人群中资源需求模型的性别差异。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 1;14:902. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-902.
10
Assessment of patient-reported symptoms of anxiety.对患者报告的焦虑症状的评估。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2014 Jun;16(2):197-211. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2014.16.2/mrose.