Simmering Vanessa R, Ou Lu, Bolsinova Maria
ACTNext by ACT, Inc., Iowa City, IA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 25;10:2168. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02168. eCollection 2019.
Advances in technology hold great promise for expanding what assessments may achieve across domains. We focus on non-cognitive skills as our domain, but lessons can be extended to other domains for both the advantages and drawbacks of new technological approaches for different types of assessments. We first briefly review the limitations of traditional assessments of non-cognitive skills. Next, we discuss specific examples of technological advances, considering whether and how they can address such limitations, followed by remaining and new challenges introduced by incorporating technology into non-cognitive assessments. We conclude by noting that technology will not always improve assessments over traditional methods and that careful consideration must be given to the advantages and limitations of each type of assessment relative to the goals and needs of the assessor. The domain of non-cognitive assessments in particular remains limited by lack of agreement and clarity on some constructs and their relations to observable behavior (e.g., self-control versus -regulation versus -discipline), and until these theoretical limitations must be overcome to realize the full benefit of incorporating technology into assessments.
技术进步为拓展评估在各个领域所能达成的目标带来了巨大希望。我们将非认知技能作为我们关注的领域,但对于新技术方法在不同类型评估中的优缺点,相关经验教训可推广至其他领域。我们首先简要回顾传统非认知技能评估的局限性。接下来,我们讨论技术进步的具体实例,思考它们是否以及如何能够解决这些局限性,随后探讨将技术纳入非认知评估所带来的遗留挑战和新挑战。我们在结论中指出,技术并不总是能比传统方法改进评估,并且必须仔细考虑每种评估类型相对于评估者目标和需求的优缺点。特别是非认知评估领域,由于在一些构念及其与可观察行为的关系(例如,自我控制与自我调节与自律)上缺乏共识和清晰度,仍然受到限制,并且在克服这些理论局限性之前,无法充分实现将技术纳入评估的益处。