Thastum Mikael, Ravn Kristine, Sommer Søren, Trillingsgaard Anegen
Department of Psychology, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
Scand J Psychol. 2009 Feb;50(1):47-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00690.x. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
This study examines reliability and validity and establish Danish norms for the Danish version of the Beck Youth Inventories (BYI) (Beck, Beck & Jolly, 2001), which consists of five self-report scales; Self-Concept (BSCI), Anxiety (BAI), Depression (BDI), Anger (BANI) and Disruptive Behavior (BDBI). A total of 1,116 school children and 128 clinical children, aged 7-14, completed BYI. Internal consistency coefficients were high. Most test-retest correlations were >0.70. A test-retest difference was found for BAI. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the five factor structure of the instrument was justified. The BSCI, BAI and BDI discriminated moderately between the norming sample and the clinical group, and the latter group included more children who exceeded the 90th percentile of the norming sample. Diagnostic groups scored higher on relevant scales than norms. Only BSCI and BDI differentiated between diagnostic groups. The BYI showed acceptable internal consistency and test-retest stability, except for BAI. The BYI did not adequately differentiate between internalizing disorders.
本研究检验了丹麦版贝克青少年量表（BYI）（Beck、Beck和Jolly，2001年）的信度和效度，并建立了丹麦常模。该量表包括五个自评量表：自我概念（BSCI）、焦虑（BAI）、抑郁（BDI）、愤怒（BANI）和破坏性行为（BDBI）。共有1116名7至14岁的学童和128名临床儿童完成了BYI测试。内部一致性系数较高。大多数重测相关性>0.70。发现BAI存在重测差异。探索性和验证性因素分析表明该量表的五因素结构是合理的。BSCI、BAI和BDI在常模样本和临床组之间有适度的区分，临床组中超过常模样本第90百分位的儿童更多。诊断组在相关量表上的得分高于常模。只有BSCI和BDI在诊断组之间有差异。除BAI外，BYI表现出可接受的内部一致性和重测稳定性。BYI在区分内化障碍方面表现不佳。
