Suppr超能文献

儿童及青少年心理剖析工具v5的心理测量特性:一种用于筛查14种最常见的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)障碍的测量工具。

Psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent PsychProfiler v5: a measure for screening 14 of the most common DSM-5 disorders.

作者信息

Langsford Shane, Gomez Rapson, Houghton Stephen, Karimi Leila

机构信息

Psychological & Educational Consultancy Services, Perth, WA, Australia.

School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1267711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1267711. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Child and Adolescent PsychProfiler version 5 (CAPP v5, 2014) is a measure for screening 14 common DSM-5 disorders in children and adolescents. The separation of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Specific Learning Disorder (SLD) by subtype results in 17 screening scales covering the 14 disorders. Theoretically then, the CAPP v5 should have a 17-factor structure, however, to date no published study has confirmed this. Additionally, there has been no comprehensive evaluation of the reliability and validity of the screening scales in this measure. These were examined across two different studies. Study 1 examined support for the 17-factor model of the parent-report version of the CAPP (CAPP-PRF) in a large group of adolescents from the general community. It also examined the internal consistency reliability and discriminant validity of the factors in this measure. Study 2 examined the validity of these factors in a clinic-referred group of adolescents.

METHODS

In Study 1, 951 parents completed the CAPP-PRF on behalf of their adolescents [mean (standard deviation) = 14.54 years (1.66 years)]. In Study 2, 173 parents completed the CAPP-PRF on behalf of their clinic-referred adolescent children [mean (standard deviation) = 14.5 years (1.84 years)]. Adolescents also completed a number of measures and tests for the purpose of assessing their behavior, IQ, and academic abilities.

RESULTS

The results in Study 1 supported a 17-factor model, and virtually all of the factors in this model showed acceptable reliability (alpha and omega coefficients), and discriminant validity. Study 2 demonstrated good support for the validity of the scales in the CAPP-PRF.

DISCUSSION

These findings indicate acceptable psychometric properties for the CAPP-PRF, and its utility for screening the more common DSM-5 disorders in children and adolescents.

摘要

引言

儿童及青少年心理剖析量表第5版(CAPP v5,2014)是一种用于筛查儿童和青少年中14种常见的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM - 5)障碍的工具。注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和特定学习障碍(SLD)按亚型分类,这使得涵盖14种障碍的筛查量表达到17个。从理论上讲,CAPP v5应该具有17因素结构,然而,迄今为止尚无已发表的研究证实这一点。此外,对于该测量中筛查量表的信度和效度也没有进行全面评估。在两项不同的研究中对这些方面进行了检验。研究1在一大群来自普通社区的青少年中检验了对CAPP家长报告版(CAPP - PRF)的17因素模型的支持情况。它还检验了该测量中各因素的内部一致性信度和区分效度。研究2在一组临床转诊的青少年中检验了这些因素的效度。

方法

在研究1中,951名家长代表他们的青少年完成了CAPP - PRF[平均(标准差)= 14.54岁(1.66岁)]。在研究2中,173名家长代表他们临床转诊的青少年子女完成了CAPP - PRF[平均(标准差)= 14.5岁(1.84岁)]。青少年还完成了一些用于评估他们行为、智商和学业能力的测量和测试。

结果

研究1的结果支持17因素模型,并且该模型中几乎所有因素都显示出可接受的信度(阿尔法系数和欧米伽系数)和区分效度。研究2对CAPP - PRF中量表的效度提供了有力支持。

讨论

这些发现表明CAPP - PRF具有可接受的心理测量学特性,以及它在筛查儿童和青少年中更常见的DSM - 5障碍方面的效用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices.理解模型大小对结构方程模型拟合指数的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):310-334. doi: 10.1177/0013164418783530. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
8
The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: from alpha to omega.多维神经心理学测量的可靠性:从阿尔法到欧米伽。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Aug-Oct;31(6-7):1113-1126. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验