• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冬季野生大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)对觅食斑块的选择与放弃受哪些因素影响?

What determines selection and abandonment of a foraging patch by wild giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in winter?

作者信息

Zhang Zejun, Zhan Xiangjiang, Yan Li, Li Ming, Hu Jinchu, Wei Fuwen

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 25 Datunluyi, Chaoyang, Beijing, 100101, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2009 Jan;16(1):79-84. doi: 10.1007/s11356-008-0066-4. Epub 2008 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-008-0066-4
PMID:18982373
Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: Foraging patches can be described as a nested hierarchy of aggregated resources, implying that study of foraging by wild animals should be directed across different spatial scales. However, almost all previous research on habitat selection by the giant panda has concentrated upon one scale. In this research, we carried out a field study to understand foraging patch selection by giant pandas in winter at both microhabitat and feeding site scales and, for the first time, attempted to understand how long it would stay at the feeding sites before moving on.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The field survey was conducted from November 2002 to March 2003 at Fengtongzhai Nature Reserve (102 degrees 48'-103 degrees 00' E, 30 degrees 19'-30 degrees 47' N), Baoxing County of Sichuan Province, China, to collect data in both microhabitat and control plots. The microhabitat plots were located by fresh feces or foraging traces left by giant pandas, and the control plots were established to reflect the environment. Within each microhabitat plot, one 1x1 m2 plot was centralized at the center of each feeding site, in which numbers of old bamboos and old shoots, including eaten and uneaten, were counted, respectively.

RESULTS

The results showed that winter microhabitats selected by this species were characteristic of gentle slopes and high old-shoot proportions and that the latter was even higher at feeding sites. Two selection processes, namely, from the environment to microhabitats and from the latter to feeding sites, were found during this species' foraging patch utilization. Giant pandas preferred to eat old shoots to old bamboo at feeding sites in winter and did not leave unless old-shoot density fell to lower than the average in the environment.

DISCUSSION

Both microhabitats and feeding sites selected by giant pandas were characteristic of high old-shoot density, indicating that the preferred food item had a significant influence upon its foraging patch selection. The preference for gentle slopes by giant pandas was presumed to save energy in movement or reflect the need to sit and free its fore-limbs to grasp bamboo culms when feeding but also seemed to be correlated with an easier access to old shoots. The utilization of old shoots at feeding sites was assumed to help maximize energy or nutrient intake during their foraging.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference between microhabitat plots and control plots and between microhabitats and feeding sites uncovered a continuous selection process from the environment via microhabitats to feeding sites. The utilization of old shoots at feeding sites was parallel to the marginal value theorem. The selection and abandonment of foraging patches by giant pandas was an optimal behavioral strategy adapted to their peculiar food with high cellulose and low protein.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Our results uncovered the importance of multiple scales in habitat selection research. To further understand the process of habitat selection, future research should pay more attention to resolve the question of how to locate foraging patches under dense bamboo forests by the giant panda, which was traditionally considered to have poor eyesight, although our research has answered what type of habitats the giant panda prefers and when to leave.

摘要

背景、目的与范围:觅食斑块可被描述为聚集资源的嵌套层次结构,这意味着对野生动物觅食的研究应在不同空间尺度上进行。然而,此前几乎所有关于大熊猫栖息地选择的研究都集中在一个尺度上。在本研究中,我们进行了一项实地研究,以了解冬季大熊猫在微生境和觅食地尺度上对觅食斑块的选择,并且首次试图了解其在继续前行之前会在觅食地停留多长时间。

材料与方法

2002年11月至2003年3月,在中国四川省宝兴县蜂桶寨自然保护区(东经102°48′ - 103°00′,北纬30°19′ - 30°47′)进行了实地调查,以收集微生境和对照样地的数据。微生境样地通过大熊猫留下的新鲜粪便或觅食痕迹来定位,对照样地则用于反映环境。在每个微生境样地内,在每个觅食地的中心设置一个1×1平方米的样方,分别统计其中老竹和老笋的数量,包括已被食用和未被食用的。

结果

结果表明,该物种冬季选择的微生境具有坡度平缓、老笋比例高的特点,且在觅食地老笋比例更高。在该物种利用觅食斑块的过程中发现了两个选择过程,即从环境到微生境以及从微生境到觅食地。冬季大熊猫在觅食地更喜欢食用老笋而非老竹,并且除非老笋密度降至低于环境中的平均水平,否则不会离开。

讨论

大熊猫选择的微生境和觅食地都具有老笋密度高的特点,这表明其偏好的食物对其觅食斑块选择有重大影响。大熊猫对平缓坡度具有偏好,推测这是为了在移动中节省能量,或者反映了其在进食时需要坐下并解放前肢来抓取竹茎的需求,但这似乎也与更容易获取老笋有关。在觅食地对老笋的利用被认为有助于在觅食过程中最大限度地获取能量或营养。

结论

微生境样地与对照样地之间以及微生境与觅食地之间的差异揭示了从环境经微生境到觅食地的连续选择过程。在觅食地对老笋的利用与边际价值定理相符。大熊猫对觅食斑块的选择和放弃是一种适应其高纤维素、低蛋白质特殊食物的最优行为策略。

建议与展望

我们的结果揭示了多尺度在栖息地选择研究中的重要性。为了进一步了解栖息地选择过程,未来的研究应更加关注解决大熊猫如何在茂密竹林下定位觅食斑块的问题,传统上认为大熊猫视力不佳,尽管我们的研究已经回答了大熊猫更喜欢何种类型的栖息地以及何时离开。

相似文献

1
What determines selection and abandonment of a foraging patch by wild giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in winter?冬季野生大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)对觅食斑块的选择与放弃受哪些因素影响?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2009 Jan;16(1):79-84. doi: 10.1007/s11356-008-0066-4. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
2
Comparison of microhabitats and foraging strategies between the captive-born Zhangxiang and wild giant pandas: implications for future reintroduction.比较笼养出生的璋祥和野生大熊猫的微生境和觅食策略:对未来再引进的启示。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Oct;22(19):15089-96. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4720-3. Epub 2015 May 24.
3
Feeding habits and foraging patch selection strategy of the giant panda in the Meigu Dafengding National Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province, China.中国四川省美姑大风顶国家级自然保护区大熊猫的食性和觅食斑块选择策略。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(17):49125-49135. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25769-0. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
4
Giant panda foraging and movement patterns in response to bamboo shoot growth.大熊猫取食和移动模式对竹笋生长的响应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Mar;25(9):8636-8643. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0919-9. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
5
Factors influencing bamboo intake of captive giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca).影响圈养大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)取食竹子的因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 17;13(1):6262. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32802-2.
6
Seasonal shifts in giant panda feeding behavior: relationships to bamboo plant part consumption.大熊猫取食行为的季节性变化:与竹类植物各部位消耗的关系
Zoo Biol. 2010 Jul-Aug;29(4):470-83. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20280.
7
Withered on the stem: is bamboo a seasonally limiting resource for giant pandas?竹茎枯萎:竹子是大熊猫的季节性限制资源吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Apr;24(11):10537-10546. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8746-6. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
8
Changes of foraging patch selection and utilization by a giant panda after bamboo flowering.竹子开花后大熊猫觅食斑块选择与利用的变化
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jul;24(19):16418-16428. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9164-5. Epub 2017 May 27.
9
[Habitat selection attributes of giant panda].[大熊猫的栖息地选择属性]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Feb;22(2):519-25.
10
Ecological scale and seasonal heterogeneity in the spatial behaviors of giant pandas.大熊猫空间行为的生态尺度与季节异质性
Integr Zool. 2014 Jan;9(1):46-60. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12030.

引用本文的文献

1
Red panda fine-scale habitat selection along a Central Himalayan longitudinal gradient.喜马拉雅中部纵向梯度上小熊猫的精细尺度栖息地选择
Ecol Evol. 2019 Apr 1;9(9):5260-5269. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5116. eCollection 2019 May.
2
Comparative habitat use by takin in the Wanglang and Xiaohegou Nature Reserves.王朗和小河沟自然保护区羚牛的栖息地利用比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Mar;25(8):7860-7865. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1133-5. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
3
Resting site use of giant pandas in Wanglang Nature Reserve.大熊猫在王朗自然保护区的休息地利用情况。

本文引用的文献

1
Winter foraging by muskoxen: a hierarchical approach to patch residence time and cratering behaviour.麝牛冬季觅食:一种关于斑块停留时间和坑洼行为的分层研究方法。
Oecologia. 1995 Sep;104(1):39-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00365560.
2
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.最优觅食,边际价值定理。
Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Apr;9(2):129-36. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x.
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 23;7(1):13809. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14315-x.
4
Giant pandas can discriminate the emotions of human facial pictures.大熊猫可以辨别人类面部图片的情绪。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 16;7(1):8437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08789-y.
5
Changes of foraging patch selection and utilization by a giant panda after bamboo flowering.竹子开花后大熊猫觅食斑块选择与利用的变化
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jul;24(19):16418-16428. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9164-5. Epub 2017 May 27.
6
The minimum area requirements (MAR) for giant panda: an empirical study.大熊猫最小生存面积需求:一项实证研究。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 8;6:37715. doi: 10.1038/srep37715.
7
Serotonin promotes exploitation in complex environments by accelerating decision-making.血清素通过加速决策过程来促进在复杂环境中的探索行为。
BMC Biol. 2016 Feb 4;14:9. doi: 10.1186/s12915-016-0232-y.
8
Comparison of microhabitats and foraging strategies between the captive-born Zhangxiang and wild giant pandas: implications for future reintroduction.比较笼养出生的璋祥和野生大熊猫的微生境和觅食策略:对未来再引进的启示。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Oct;22(19):15089-96. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4720-3. Epub 2015 May 24.
9
Habitat use by giant panda in relation to man-made forest in Wanglang Nature Reserve of China.中国王朗自然保护区大熊猫对与人工林相关栖息地的利用情况。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014 Dec;21(23):13440-5. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3194-z. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
10
Can conservation of single surrogate species protect co-occurring species?单一替代物种的保护能否保护共存物种?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Sep;20(9):6290-6. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-1675-0. Epub 2013 Apr 16.