Hoel Robert W, Albright Robert C, Beyer Lisa K, Santrach Paula J, Magtibay Donna L, Everson Stephanie L, McBane Robert D
Department of Pharmacy Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jan;4(1):99-104. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03360708. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
To determine whether point-of-care (POC) International Normalized Ratio (INR) test results correlate with plasma INR measures in intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) patients on warfarin. Anemia is thought to reduce the accuracy of POC INR assay results. Whether POC INR testing could be implemented for hemodialysis patients on chronic warfarin, who are often anemic despite hematopoietic therapy, has not been established.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Thirty-seven chronic hemodialysis patients on warfarin contributed sets of three consecutive blood samples for INR comparison immediately before hemodialysis: one finger stick, two from hemodialysis access (arteriovenous graft, fistula, or catheter). POC INR testing was performed using CoaguChek S device. Anemia was defined as hematocrit < 32%.
Pairwise comparison and correlation of 258 INR results showed high correlation for POC versus laboratory INR (r = 0.94; P < 0.001). Of these, 16 (6%) differed by >0.6 INR units, four (1.6%) differed by >0.8 INR units, and one differed by >1.0 INR units. Resulting pairwise correlation analyses between samples were: for anemic patients (0.96; P < 0.001), nonanemic patients (0.93; P < 0.001), and for those obtained from arteriovenous grafts (0.94; P < 0.001). POC INR samples from dialysis catheters correlated poorly with laboratory INR results.
POC INR correlates well with plasma INR measures in IHD patients requiring chronic warfarin, and anemia did not influence this reliability. Blood sampling from finger stick or arteriovenous graft or fistula showed excellent correlation with laboratory INR, whereas sampling from dialysis catheters was unsatisfactory, likely from heparin contamination.
确定即时检验(POC)国际标准化比值(INR)检测结果与接受华法林治疗的间歇性血液透析(IHD)患者的血浆INR测量值是否相关。贫血被认为会降低POC INR检测结果的准确性。对于长期接受华法林治疗且尽管接受造血治疗仍常伴有贫血的血液透析患者,能否实施POC INR检测尚未明确。
设计、地点、参与者及测量方法:37名接受华法林治疗的慢性血液透析患者在每次血液透析前即刻提供三组连续血样用于INR比较:一份指尖血样,两份来自血液透析通路(动静脉移植物、内瘘或导管)。使用CoaguChek S设备进行POC INR检测。贫血定义为血细胞比容<32%。
对258个INR结果进行成对比较和相关性分析显示,POC INR与实验室INR高度相关(r = 0.94;P < 0.001)。其中,16个结果(6%)相差>0.6 INR单位,4个结果(1.6%)相差>0.8 INR单位,1个结果相差>1.0 INR单位。样本间的成对相关性分析结果如下:贫血患者(0.96;P < 0.001)、非贫血患者(0.93;P < 0.001)以及来自动静脉移植物的样本(0.94;P < 0.001)。来自透析导管的POC INR样本与实验室INR结果的相关性较差。
在需要长期服用华法林的IHD患者中,POC INR与血浆INR测量值相关性良好,贫血并未影响这种可靠性。从指尖、动静脉移植物或内瘘采集血样与实验室INR显示出极佳的相关性,而从透析导管采集血样则不尽人意,可能是由于肝素污染。