• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医院外展环境中启动华法林治疗时,CoaguChek S和XS即时检测设备的准确性及临床实用性。

Accuracy and clinical usefulness of the CoaguChek S and XS Point of Care devices when starting warfarin in a hospital outreach setting.

作者信息

Sobieraj-Teague Magdalena, Daniel Dolly, Farrelly Barbara, Coghlan Douglas, Gallus Alexander

机构信息

Flinders Medical Centre, Department of Haematology, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2009 Apr;123(6):909-13. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2008.10.006
PMID:19042011
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess clinical usefulness of CoaguChek S and XS monitors to measure International Normalised Ratio (INR) when starting warfarin in community patients.

METHODS

INR in consecutive patients starting warfarin plus enoxaparin was measured in the laboratory and on capillary blood at home using CoaguChek S or XS point of care (POC) devices. INR was measured daily until >2.0 for 2 consecutive readings. Linear regression and Bland Altman plots were derived to compare POC with laboratory INR. Percentages of POC measurements within 0.5 and 0.8 units of laboratory INR <2.0, 2.0-3.5 and >3.5 were calculated. Clinical utility was assessed using previously reported criteria.

RESULTS

200 CoaguChek S and 337 CoaguChek XS results were obtained from 57 and 98 patients respectively and paired with laboratory values. Correlation was acceptable between CoaguChek S and laboratory INRs (r(2)=0.7732), and excellent between CoaguChek XS and laboratory INRs (r(2)=0.9514). Bland-Altman plots showed an increasing difference between laboratory INR above 3.0 for CoaguChek S INRs but no systematic bias with increasing CoaguChek XS INRs. 83.5% of CoaguChek S and 93.5% of CoaguChek XS INRs were within 0.5 units of laboratory INR. 90% of CoaguChek S and 99.4% of the CoaguChek XS INRs were within 0.8 units of laboratory INR. Clinical agreement occurred in 89% and 99.7% of cases by expanded criteria and 82% and 99.4% of cases by narrow criteria when using CoaguChek S and CoaguChek XS respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The CoaguChek XS is suitable for outpatient INR monitoring when starting warfarin.

摘要

目的

评估在社区患者开始使用华法林时,CoaguChek S和XS监测仪测量国际标准化比值(INR)的临床实用性。

方法

对连续使用华法林加依诺肝素的患者,在实验室测定INR,并使用CoaguChek S或XS即时检验(POC)设备在家中采集毛细血管血测定INR。每天测量INR,直至连续两次读数>2.0。采用线性回归和布兰德-奥特曼图比较POC与实验室INR。计算实验室INR<2.0、2.0 - 3.5和>3.5时,POC测量值在实验室INR的0.5和0.8单位范围内的百分比。使用先前报告的标准评估临床实用性。

结果

分别从57例和98例患者中获得了200个CoaguChek S和337个CoaguChek XS的结果,并与实验室值配对。CoaguChek S与实验室INR之间的相关性尚可(r(2)=0.7732),CoaguChek XS与实验室INR之间的相关性良好(r(2)=0.9514)。布兰德-奥特曼图显示,CoaguChek S的INR在实验室INR高于3.0时差异增大,但CoaguChek XS的INR升高时无系统偏差。83.5%的CoaguChek S和93.5%的CoaguChek XS的INR在实验室INR的0.5单位范围内。90%的CoaguChek S和99.4%的CoaguChek XS的INR在实验室INR的0.8单位范围内。使用CoaguChek S和CoaguChek XS时,根据扩展标准,临床一致性分别出现在89%和99.7%的病例中;根据严格标准,分别出现在82%和99.4%的病例中。

结论

开始使用华法林时,CoaguChek XS适用于门诊患者INR监测

相似文献

1
Accuracy and clinical usefulness of the CoaguChek S and XS Point of Care devices when starting warfarin in a hospital outreach setting.在医院外展环境中启动华法林治疗时,CoaguChek S和XS即时检测设备的准确性及临床实用性。
Thromb Res. 2009 Apr;123(6):909-13. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Nov 29.
2
Accuracy of the CoaguChek XS for point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) measurement in children requiring warfarin.CoaguChek XS用于需要华法林治疗的儿童即时国际标准化比值(INR)测量的准确性。
Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jun;99(6):1097-103. doi: 10.1160/TH07-10-0634.
3
Acceptability of CoaguChek S and CoaguChek XS generated international normalised ratios against a laboratory standard in a paediatric setting.在儿科环境中,CoaguChek S和CoaguChek XS血糖仪生成的国际标准化比值相对于实验室标准的可接受性。
Pathology. 2007 Dec;39(6):575-9. doi: 10.1080/00313020701684797.
4
Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).儿童口服抗凝治疗的床旁监测。使用国际参考凝血活酶制剂(rTF/95)对CoaguChek XS系统与静脉血国际标准化比值(INR)及静脉血INR进行比较。
Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jul;102(1):159-65. doi: 10.1160/TH09-01-0056.
5
Accuracy of capillary whole blood international normalized ratio on the CoaguChek S, CoaguChek XS, and i-STAT 1 point-of-care analyzers.CoaguChek S、CoaguChek XS和i-STAT 1即时检验分析仪上毛细血管全血国际标准化比值的准确性。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Jul;130(1):88-92. doi: 10.1309/DEK41W141Y0KRN8A.
6
Accuracy and clinical utility of the CoaguChek XS portable international normalised ratio monitor in a pilot study of warfarin home-monitoring.在一项华法林家庭监测的初步研究中,CoaguChek XS便携式国际标准化比值监测仪的准确性和临床实用性。
J Clin Pathol. 2007 Mar;60(3):311-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.037820. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
7
The clinical significance of differences between point-of-care and laboratory INR methods in over-anticoagulated patients.即时检测 INR 与实验室 INR 方法在过度抗凝患者中的临床意义差异。
Thromb Res. 2012 Jul;130(1):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.08.027. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
8
Comparison and evaluation of a Point-of-care device (CoaguChek XS) to Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin.用于监测华法林口服抗凝治疗的即时检测设备(CoaguChek XS)与奥伦氏凝血酶原时间测定法的比较与评估。
Thromb Res. 2009 Jul;124(3):344-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 May 6.
9
The reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S and XS INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring.即时凝血酶原时间检测的可靠性。CoaguChek S 和 XS INR 测量值与医院实验室监测的比较。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2010 Feb;32(1 Pt 1):e26-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2008.01120.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
10
Accuracy of CoaguChek XS for point-of-care antithrombotic monitoring in children with heart disease.CoaguChek XS用于心脏病患儿即时抗血栓监测的准确性。
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2010 Summer;40(3):247-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Smart approach for international normalized ratio monitoring: Pakistan's perspective.国际标准化比值监测的明智方法:巴基斯坦的视角
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Aug 1;86(10):5660-5661. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002419. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Enhancing postoperative anticoagulation therapy with remote patient monitoring: A pilot crossover trial study to evaluate portable coagulometers and chatbots in cardiac surgery follow-up.通过远程患者监测加强术后抗凝治疗:一项评估便携式凝血仪和聊天机器人在心脏手术随访中应用的试点交叉试验研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 6;10:20552076241269515. doi: 10.1177/20552076241269515. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Lab on a Chip Device for Diagnostic Evaluation and Management in Chronic Renal Disease: A Change Promoting Approach in the Patients' Follow Up.
芯片实验室诊断设备在慢性肾病中的评估与管理:一种改善患者随访的变革方法。
Biosensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 12;13(3):373. doi: 10.3390/bios13030373.
4
The Value of Anticoagulation Management Combining Telemedicine and Self-Testing in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.远程医疗与自我检测相结合的心血管疾病抗凝管理的价值:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Mar 14;19:279-290. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S395578. eCollection 2023.
5
Cost-Utility and Budget Impact Analysis of Implementing Anticoagulation Clinics and Point-of-Care Monitoring Devices in Anticoagulated Patients in Argentina.阿根廷抗凝患者中实施抗凝诊所和即时检测监测设备的成本效用及预算影响分析
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Sep;6(5):657-668. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00352-4. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
6
Point-of-care testing technologies for the home in chronic kidney disease: a narrative review.慢性肾脏病居家即时检测技术:一项叙述性综述
Clin Kidney J. 2021 Apr 20;14(11):2316-2331. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab080. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Microfluidics in Haemostasis: A Review.微流控技术在止血中的应用:综述。
Molecules. 2020 Feb 14;25(4):833. doi: 10.3390/molecules25040833.
8
Assessment of agreement and time in therapeutic range of capillary versus venous international normalised ratio in frail elderly people in a nursing home.评估养老院虚弱老年人毛细血管与静脉国际标准化比值治疗范围内的一致性和时间。
Intern Med J. 2019 Nov;49(11):1442-1446. doi: 10.1111/imj.14626.
9
Global assays and the management of oral anticoagulation.全球检测与口服抗凝治疗的管理
Thromb J. 2015 Feb 10;13:9. doi: 10.1186/s12959-015-0037-1. eCollection 2015.
10
Academic College of Emergency Experts in India's INDO-US Joint Working Group and OPUS12 Foundation Consensus Statement on Creating A Coordinated, Multi-Disciplinary, Patient-Centered, Global Point-of-Care Biomarker Discovery Network.印度学术急诊专家参与的印美联合工作组及OPUS12基金会关于创建一个协调、多学科、以患者为中心的全球即时护理生物标志物发现网络的共识声明。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Jul;4(3):200-8. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.141398.